User talk:M.Arjeneh

Welcome!

Hello, M.Arjeneh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as List of powder software, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Jdrewitt (talk) 09:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of List of powder software


The article List of powder software has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * List of un-notable specialist scientific software wholly unreferenced and unencyclopedic

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jdrewitt (talk) 09:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:JpowderLogo.png
Thanks for uploading File:JpowderLogo.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 21:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

AfD for Jpowder
I have nominated the article Jpowder for deletion. You can contribute to the discussion here: Articles for deletion/Jpowder. However please note that the article appears to fail wikipedia's notability guidelines which can be read here: WP:NOTABILITY. I also believe that you have a conflict of interest and are trying to promote the software using wikipedia, this is not what wikipedia is meant to be used for, please read WP:NOT for more details. Please note that in general software developed by central facilities for use more or less soley by the users of such facilities is unfortunately unlikely to ever meet wikipedia's notability guidelines. Cheers Jdrewitt (talk) 15:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)