User talk:M.Ashraf333/Archives/2023/02 (February)


 * header=

Badak Jawa talk page
The user Badak Jawa is attempting to translate the article Maurice Novoa from Indonesian to English, I simply translated it all for him as I could see he was having trouble. Agnez Mo fan (talk) 07:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I also gave him some valuable advise in Indonesian which you deleted as well. Agnez Mo fan (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello @Agnez Mo fan,
 * Thank you for contribution in wikipe, talk page isn't the place for it. I can see Maurice Novoa (if I am not wrong) already exists, make your changes with reliable refs over there and if the subject wasn't on Wikipedia then please use draft or sandbox for this purpose. Thank you M.Ashraf333 (talk) 09:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Aisya Eleesa moved to draftspace
Unfortunately, an article you recently created Aisya Eleesa, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 09:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi Ashraf, she has already played matches in 2022 Women's Twenty20 Asia Cup, which has been listed in International cricket in 2022–23. Hence, she page becomes eligible to be published. Vikram Maingi (talk) 09:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello @Vikram maingi,
 * Thank you for your contributions. Playing an international matches isn't the criteria of being publish the article in mainspace. Please add some reliable sources which verify that the subject is notable and important. Thank you M.Ashraf333 (talk) 09:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi again. Sure, I will add a few more sources before moving it to the mainspace. Thanks, Vikram Maingi (talk) 10:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Kongunadu cuisine
I have just checked for plagiarism content of the page anf found to be very less. Can you please check again and just state which part of the article is copyrighted content. B8ird (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello @B8ird.
 * Thank you for your contributions, I have removed the deletion tag as the article now have low similarity according to the Copyvio. Article still need to solve copyright issue especially on "Popular Dishes" section. Thank you M.Ashraf333 (talk) 10:50, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Ooh Ok. Thank You very much.
 * Generally Populur Dishes section is list of words from south Indian dishes names. So, It use to have plagiarim which is invitable. I have changed spellings and explanations, order of it. B8ird (talk) 10:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Kongunadu+cuisine&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=1
 * Now, You can check. It has come down drastically. B8ird (talk) 11:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * That's very good.👍 M.Ashraf333 (talk) 11:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Barnstar for you

 * @Onel5969, Thank you very much for appreciation. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 01:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 2023 International Conference on Climate Resilient Pakistan
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Alika Milova
When you moved the article to draftspace, did you do it because the sources and cictations weren't reliable enough, because the article didn't have enough content or because of a different reason? DSOFOreverTYU ~  talk  ~  Eurovision  17:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Qamar Javed Bajwa
Please keep an eye on this. Too much WP:BLP violations. 109.171.194.161 (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Qamar Javed Bajwa
Hello M.Ashraf333. I have noticed that you have been in some kind of edit war over the article Qamar Javed Bajwa. Please see WP:BLPBALANCE. Your removal of the entire controversy section of the article which is well cited and sourced disturbs the balance and tone of the article. A Wikipedia article is not a place for promotion or to create a laudatory article, and should contain a balanced point of view which includes any controversy or notable incident that is well documented in the media. I suggest you to get consensus on talk page before any mass removal of content. Regards Razer ( talk ) 08:24, 7 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Razer2115، It would be better if you mentioned which edit war I did. I have reverted some edits as I have already explained because this whole section is based on a daily news routine and all this stuff is not confirmed by any coat of law. Daily political party statements and daily hearing of court cannot be part of Wikipedia under any circumstances. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 09:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Most of the section looks reasonably sourced and cited to me. You are more than welcome to remove any part which you feel violates WP:BLP or WP:RS and we can have the discussion on the merits and demerits of those particular parts on the talkpage but bulldozing the entire controversy section and turning the article to a borderline fanpage is not constructive editing. I suggest that you take a more consensus based approach and consult your fellow editors on the way forward instead of weaponizing the 3RR rule to force your view point on the article . After all, We are all here to build an encyclopedia  Razer ( talk ) 10:38, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Nadir Ali (comedian) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadir Ali (comedian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nadir Ali (comedian)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Saqib (talk) 08:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Saqib (talk) 15:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Alika Milova
About two weeks ago, you moved the article Alika Milova to draftspace. I added more content and reliable sources to the page, and removed non-reliable sources. Do you think the page is now ready? DSOFOreverTYU ~  talk  ~  Eurovision  19:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @DSOFOreverTYU, The references are reliable but she appears in passing mentions and doesn't meet the criteria of WP:MUSICBIO, however if you believe yhe article should be in mainspace then please submit it for another review. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 01:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Sharkbook
Hi there! As you requested I have added multiple new references providing reliable independent coverage for many years of the project itself, the organizations that sponsor it including NYT article, National Geographic, CBS News, ZDNET. In addition, I have added several of the highly cited scientific papers that document the impact of the project and its global environmental impact. I would appreciate it if you would take another look to see if I addressed your concern and if so return it to the article space.

EagleRaymond (talk) 16:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)