User talk:M.Caban/Edit Wikipedia Job Characteristics Theory

♦ Edit Wikipedia: Job Characteristics Theory Talk Page♦

...................................................................... Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

................................................... Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Aaleksanian

Date of review:	 4/13/13

Date of review:04/17/13

Name of Editor: M. Caban

URL of editor’s Userpage:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Job_Characteristics_Theory

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:04/17/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 04/17/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Meets the requirement

Image (needed/appropriate): Not necessary Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Accurate to textbook information Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A Wikiformatting: Very good formatting Grammar & composition: Proper Other comments:	 Well done job. The color of heading might not blend with the article being edited. Aaleksanian (talk) 14:23, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Hmehta0120

Date of review: 4/24/2013

Name of editor: M.Caban

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:M.Caban/Edit_Wikipedia_Job_Characteristics_Theory

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: April 24, 2013

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/24/2013

Length of edit (too long/too short): I think the length can be something more to work on only for the first part of improving core job characteristics (also work on the flow of it, like how you started the sentence), as for JDS you have great amount of information.

Image (needed/appropriate) N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): You have cited your source, and yes it is accurate to the textbook

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych):N/A

Wikiformatting: Formatting is great!! Great job! You used creative things such as numbers, bullets, and making major points in bold such as JDS.

Grammar & composition: Seems well to be, just something to work on is the flow of sentences. Other comments: Seems great to me, just the way you have started some of the sentences, for example “Hackman and Oldman also concluded…” I would give a little background information before going straight to the point or maybe your view points or something, As for what you have wrote about JDS was great. Also the page you plan to edit has great images and charts see if you could get a great image for JDS or something. Good has some sample images of JDS but aren't the best of quality. Good Luck

Hmehta0120 (talk) 03:31, 25 April 2013 (UTC)