User talk:M.kafashha

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Kafashha (July 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammad Kafashha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mohammad_Kafashha Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gusfriend&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mohammad_Kafashha reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 10:44, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Kafashha (July 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammad Kafashha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mohammad_Kafashha Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Umakant_Bhalerao&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mohammad_Kafashha reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Kafashha


A tag has been placed on Mohammad Kafashha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ComplexRational (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, M.kafashha. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Mohammad Kafashha, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad kafashha


A tag has been placed on Mohammad kafashha, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)


 * hey
 * I didn't promotion or advertising.
 * just create a page for verified artist:
 * [external links redacted] M.kafashha (talk) 16:30, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Looking at your contributions from 22 July, 28 July and today, it's becoming evident you have only been here so far for self-promotion. Do you intend to make other edits? – NJD-DE (talk) 16:34, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I already have dozen edits on pages and updated them
 * Special:Contributions/M.kafashha M.kafashha (talk) 16:40, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You are not notable enough for inclusion according to Wikipedia's inclusion for people in general and musicians in particular. All the sources you have given are self-published and therefore disqualified from establishing you as notable. We have no interest in what someone wishes to say about himself... we only care about what reliable, third-party publications have chosen to write about someone.
 * You will be considered notable if and when you have acquired significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. And should you gain the level of notability where someone writes an article about you, you will have no right of ownership or control over its content.
 * So in summary, please refrain from attempting to create an article about yourself, for reasons better explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Autobiography. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * sure
 * thanks M.kafashha (talk) 17:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)