User talk:M.kal54/Epidemiology of pneumonia/Skallasj4863 Peer Review

Peer Review Comments
-Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? The comment about adults in the United States part distracted me since most of your edits are on children. Wondering if this is necessary. Otherwise, everything else was relevant.

-Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Yes, article is neutral and doesn't appear biased.

-Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No. -Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes, your sources support your claims and data. Just make sure all facts/statements are cited with a number that relates back to its citation at the bottom of the page.

-Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? No bias is noted, all facts seem supported. It seems like you used reliable references.

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added? Your information seems up to date, if any more recent statistics have been published, be sure to add those in as well.

-Great job! All my edits were made in bold and italicized fonts!