User talk:M.thoriyan/Archive 1

Sorry
About this. You caught it a second before, but I had already clicked "revert". Airplaneman  ✈  19:41, 28 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about it, happens to me too, especially before I started using Twinkle. I just wanna know, how can I get my userpage to look like yours? (didn't wanna copy&paste w/o your permission) thoriyan 03:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. Well, you might not have seen, but at the very bottom right of my userpage, it says I got it from User:MuZemike :). I tweaked it to my specifications. Since Wikipedia is free (even my userpage!) you can copy it as long as you provide attribution. Airplaneman   ✈  19:00, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh. Thanks, I will. thoriyan 03:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Spanish Brazilian
That user Ninguem removed several informations from article Spanish Brazilian. He over-edited that article so that nobody would notice he was removing informations he deslikes or wants to hide from readers.

Just look older editions and you will see how much informations he erased. Please, reverted back that article to its original way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.62.216.172 (talk) 03:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Discuss it with him on the article's designated talk page. Editwarring will not help anything. thoriyan 03:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

"Idiotic"
If I'm an idiot, I am. You are mean. 99.38.127.97 (talk) 15:46, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * This is coming from the one who "wants to cut my damn penis off with a saw". [1 ] thoriyan 17:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Look, move on. If you still want to make constructive edits, please go ahead: I will stop bothering you. However, if you continue to troll my page and/or vandalise pages, I will have to report you. thoriyan 17:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Your AIV report on 66.36.229.140
Thank you for your report on. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and you are encouraged to revert, warn and report inappropriate conduct. I have however declined to act on this report for the following reason:

Considering this is an IP, we can't be certain this is the same person.

The Guide to administrator intervention against vandalism might be a helpful read if you wish to improve your future reports. If you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask me on my [ talk page]. Cheers! -- Luk  talk 19:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Your request for rollback
Hi. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 07:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

TUSC token 5d742335c838305f81126ec49eb176d2
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Alan Faneca, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ~  Nerdy Science  Dude  02:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * this was meant in good faith: i meant to suggest that it needs rewording...also, it's a talk page...thoriyan 02:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, but using things like LOL suggest forum usage. ~  Nerdy Science  Dude  02:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. I'm not sure what your justification was on this edit. If you read Missy Franklin's biography, it clearly says "Missy the missle". Philipmj24 (talk) 20:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Hey, sorry about that. "Missle" appeared to be a misspelled word, which I thought was an unsourced/fan-edited addition. My mistake.

Oops!
Hey M.thoriyan,

It appears you made a mistake reverting an edit on the article Open Season (film series), as such I have undone your action to the edit made by the user in question. Please take care to make sure you don't revert correct information by accident!

-=- Adam Walker -=- 02:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that! The fact that neither Munn nor Taylor have Wikipedia entries and that Mike Epps is listed on his own page as being in Open Season 3 made me believe that the edit was incorrect. I did crossreference it, but as you've presented some hard evidence I take back my edit. Cheers! thoriyan 02:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token e92af15818d039cb0f9c6ddd73afb791
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Welcome to Pittsburgh Steelers project
I just wanted to welcome you to the Steelers project, which I noticed that you "joined" over the weekend. Also I want to commend you on the major overhaul of Keith Butler (American football), which has long been on my personal to-do list. Unfortunately, the project has been pretty dormant lately, so it's good to see some new blood. Maybe we can get this thing kick-started again. I've been working lately on rewriting and expanding the History of the Pittsburgh Steelers article—please take a look and let me know what you think (I'm currently around ). Anything I can help you with that is Steelers-related, please let me know. &mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 21:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Cool! I'm not old enough to know anything firsthand before say 1970: I'm not averse to looking stuff up, but I don't know much about the 1940s. I think I'm gonna focus mainly on beefing up the stubs of coaches and players in more modern times, even the obscure ones, just to fix structure, sourcing, the like.  Good to meet you! thoriyan 23:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. There's definitely plenty of work to be done expanding stubs in the project. I just wanted to let you know I was here if anything comes up. By the way, I don't have first-hand knowledge of anything before the 70's either, but I've been enjoying doing the research on the franchise. Take care. &mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 14:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: Sean Kugler
The article looks very good for the most part. I fixed a couple of small things. I question the value of the "coaching tree" section, just because Kugler is not now nor is likely to soon (ever?) be a head coach. But as long as it's there, there's no sense in striking it. If it's kept, you might consider adding Chris Petersen at BSU to it. Keep up the good work! &mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 03:40, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * That makes sense. I modeled the page after Larry Zierlein, so the format's pretty much the same. Will add Petersen to list.  thoriyan 13:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * It's likely that I'm the one who added the "coaching tree" table to the Zierlein article. Since then, I've rethought the value of that information for position coaches. Like I said, it's not hurting anything, but it's probably not vital information either. &mdash; DeeJayK (talk) 15:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

 * Done. thoriyan

Your message to me regarding my edit on Race and Genetics
Thanks for intervening. I am not able to identify the consensus change you have made.My editorial changes that were quickly reverted by the other user was only giving a valid alternate point of view that was needed in what is an area of science that is controversial.You will concur that evolution is not conclusively proved and is at best a belief of some scientists who could be called evolutionary biologists. Thanks for your attention.AndrewAz (talk) 09:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

-- moved to your talk page to continue talking. thoriyan 13:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Response to your response on my edit in Race and Genetics
Hi! You have said that Wikipedia should be written from a neutral perspective. That's the point! The article on Race and Genetics is anything but neutral. In fact it is openly pushing for an evolutionary point of view. The word 'evolved' is used three times in the first para of the sub-section on evolution in the article as I last saw it just a while ago. I would like you to kindly deal with that blatantly non-neutral position. I have stopped editing that article. I would like to see how neutrality will be restored to that one para for a start, let alone other references to evolution in the article. Further, the study of Genetics need not be deeply rooted in evolution. Genetics is a study focussed on and related to genes  - the DNA - tangible and verifiable. This is good science. Why should Genetics look for support in Evolution that is itself in serious need of credible bolstering arguments? Thoriyan, you are welcome to your opinion and I to mine. But I would like proponents of an evolutionary worldview to state one conclusive proof to bolster their idea and not go about talking authoritatively on the subject as if it were proved beyond doubt. .Thanks for your attention!AndrewAz (talk) 09:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking. This will allow you to edit through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions.

Note in particular that you are not permitted to use this newly-granted right to edit Wikipedia via anonymous proxies, or disruptively. If you do, or there is a serious concern of abuse, then the right may be removed by any administrator.

Appropriate usage and compliance with the policy may be checked periodically, due to the nature of block exemption, and block exemption will be removed when no longer needed (for example, when the block it is related to expires).

I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. v/r - TP 01:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)