User talk:M122763

Not quite ready
In my opinion, the article (here) is not quite ready to move into article space. I'll explain why, and remove the request to move this article into article space. Other editors may feel differently, so if you disagree with my reasons, feel free to replace the move request template, and someone else may move it for you.

The subject matter is very specific. Perhaps it ought to be a section of an existing article? Sorry, have no specific suggestions, but will help you look if you think this makes sense.

One of the important requirements of an article in Wikipedia is that it demonstrate the Notability of the topic. (While this is a guideline, not an absolute requirement and exceptions can occur, they are rare.) I don't feel this article has demonstrated the notability of the topic. This can be accomplished by adding references to reliable sources which support the notability of the topic.

It is important for Wikipedia articles to have references to reliable sources. While you have some references, I believe you need additional references to make this article acceptable. Please add some references to support the factual claims in the draft article.

December 2015
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Wisconsin bankruptcy alternative, from its old location at User:M122763/Wisconsin Chapter 128 Bankruptcy Alternative.. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:07, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Wisconsin bankruptcy alternative concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wisconsin bankruptcy alternative, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:44, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wisconsin bankruptcy alternative


Hello, M122763. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Wisconsin bankruptcy alternative".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)