User talk:M1jam

Welcome!

Hello, M1jam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! &mdash; Scientizzle 13:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hello Fluffermutter

RE: Wikipedia page of Chip Rogers, Georgia politician

You declined my unblock request because you don’t know the facts.

I posted factual material taken from the politician’s on-camera admissions. His supporters keep removing these embarassing documented facts. His opponents keep re-posting them. How that makes ME guilty of meatpuppetry or sockpuppetry is beyond my comprehension.

I don’t have any particular interest in editing Wikipedia pages. I only have an interest in understanding how Wikipedia works and whether I should consider it a biased or unbiased source.

If someone can "block me" from adding purely factual information that the "living person" has admitted in television interviews posted  on the internet -- and all the "blocking" editor needs to do is make an unsupported (and false) claim of "meatpuppetry" --  then Wikipedia can’t be a source for unbiased factual information. You are allowing Wikipedia to be the puppet of the politically motivated people that make such unsupported false claims in order to block me from adding factually accurate information that is well documented. A Wiki page that uses the word “reportedly” to make a proven fact appear as if it’s a mere allegation is simply biased reporting.

So Wikipedia is not worthy of my trust. M1jam (talk) 01:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)