User talk:M1ss1ontomars2k4

Hello; this is a talk page. Please leave me a message! (I will reply on your talk page.) Also, insults will generally not be taken seriously. Instead, I will probably laugh at your poor use of capitalization, horrible spelling, and/or confusing grammar. I am active usually between 23:00 and 6:00 UTC, so if you message me outside of that time you probably won't get an immediate response. --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T

Archive 1: 19:32, June 3, 2004 to 05:49:20, October 26, 2006

Hi,
I know about what I was editing in the chinese naval weaponry page. The previous statement was incorrect. Do check the brahmos link. Since I don't have a user ID, you can contact me at anirban DOT flames AT THE RATE OF gmail DOT com, regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.224.234 (talk) 00:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

User:6M2
You can't take away the article "User:6M2". I believe this article is not relly socializing but letting others in our community to get to know us more better and what we think. If you disagree, please tell me why. Thank you. mysticperson23 9talk) 9:41, 5 June 2008 (EST)

Hi there
Just dropping by to say hi. :] Evillic (talk) 07:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Old Forge-Taylor Football Rivalry
What other information could be posted on such a page other than scores? Do you know how hard it is to research this information on old micro-films? This was a concise, informative page for everyone ever associated with the rivalry. What harm did it do by leaving it alone? P.S. The scores are dead on accurate as I researched EVERY year personally. Lou72JG (talk) 19:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Fast reverts
True enough. But in his case, since I'm refreshing his contributions page every 10 seconds, I'm pretty confident. :-) Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 01:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Upcoming template changes
Hi, I've just noticed that you recently left a templated userpage message. I'm just bringing to your attention that the format and context of these templates will be shortly changing. It is recommended that you visit WikiProject user warnings and harmonisation discussion pages to find out how these changes could affect the templates you use. We also would appreciate any insights or thoughts you may have on the subject. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards Khukri ( talk  .  contribs ) 14:19, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Oops!
Sorry... ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 00:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiGuard
Hey, thanks for contributing to the article. I know it's small, but every little bit helps. If you think it's looking okay now, check this out. Image:WikiGuard.png. --Brad Beattie (talk) 02:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, I just noticed that you offered to test, which is great! I have a sourceforge page with a bug and feature tracker running. Right now the app isn't fully functional as clicking either of the revert buttons doesn't actually revert as I've yet to write the code. I suspect I'll get that part up and running within the next 2 days. I'll point you to the download after that. Cool? --Brad Beattie (talk) 05:27, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the screenshot isn't a mock-up or anything. That's the in-development program running. Still a few things to be polished up, but I'll get it to you within 48 hours. :)

Okay, I got the most recent version up. I was working on integrating the webview, but I had to scrap it for this release as the MediaWiki API isn't yet letting me programmatically submit changes to articles (meaning we can't yet easily have a one-click revert button). So here's what you do: go and download the most recent version. Load it up and go nuts. Gimme a call on Skype if you're running into any problems. Cool? --Brad Beattie (talk) 11:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, here's the bug tracker and the feature tracker. Upload some new ones if you see anything and I'm not online. --Brad Beattie (talk) 12:11, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

The toolbar bug you're seeing is the result of having a previous version of WikiGuard installed, I think. Just drag the default toolbar back onto it. That should solve that. As for the other bugs, I've put them into the tracker and I'll take a look at them today. Much appreciated! --Brad Beattie (talk) 01:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, do you have one of the following through which we could communicate (in order of preference): Skype (bradbeattie), GTalk (bradbeattie@gmail.com), IRC (bradbeattie@freenode)? Just contact me on one of those if you can. Makes active chatting easier. --Brad Beattie (talk) 01:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

72.229.132.109
dont leave messages on my page again —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.132.109 (talk • contribs)

Thanks
For reverting vandalism to my user page. I appreciate it. --Guinnog 23:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

do you know, for sure that 24.80.106.240 editing Homophobia is not actually Supercraft99?
is that IP a known spoofer or sock-artist? just curious. i've seen people edit from an IP and sign their WP username and i've never seen this get blanked by someone else, except maybe in the Bogdanov affair. r b-j 00:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Well...I have some evidence both ways. 24.80.106.240 belongs to somebody in Canada, and Supercraft99 is, in fact, located in Canada. However, the IP is from Alberta whereas Supercraft99 is from British Columbia (according to his userpage). I don't really like impersonators, but perhaps I should have left this alone? What do you think? --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 01:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * it's just that Homophobia is a really hot (as in controversial, perhaps i should call it "toxic" or "radioactive") WP article. it's been frozen since last month and, even with a mediator poking her head in, has had a lot of acrimony expressed in the talk page.  if you know it isn't really Supercraft99, it should be removed.  i dunno what to say if you have a good suspicion but not an air-tight case it is.  the real Supercraft99 oughta be able to revert the deletion (hopefully logged in), but if the IP (or even someone else) reverts it, i would not delete it again, unless you know for sure it's a spoof.  at least that's my judgement about it. r b-j 02:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello, it's Supercraft99 here. Sorry, I was tired and forgot to log in when I posted on the talk page. About the Alberta thing, my Internet Service Provider, Shaw, has it's head offices in Alberta. Supercraft99 04:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
For the Intel Version of AIV'er. I was going to ask someone to see if it worked for Intel Macs, but I guess it didn't. The next release I'll make sure is a universal binary to make it easy for everyone. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 05:51, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep, I took the day today and got a universal release out. Hopefully that'll be better. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 05:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I just want to notify you that I have made a (simi-)major update of AIV'er. You can see the details on it's page. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello M1ss1ontomars2k4, I am in the process of a major edit of the Beeston regis Page and we seem to Be Doing the same thing! Will you be carrying on with your clean-up before i have finished or do you want me to stop my editsStavros1 23:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

IC 442
I have encountered the article you created on IC 442. I found hardly anything on this galaxy in the scientific literature. As far as I can tell, it is a fairly uninteresting spiral galaxy. Could you please explain why you created an article on this galaxy? Dr. Submillimeter 16:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I was just hoping for more information on this object that could potentially be put into the article. Dr. Submillimeter 15:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

THANKS
thanks dear for ur guidence! SANJAYBAFNA 06:57, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

AQ Wikiproject
Hey M1ss1ontomars2k4, I noticed you have an interest in AQ. I'm trying to start a AQ Wikiproject. It'd be cool if you could go to WikiProject Council/Proposals and add yourself to the list of interested Wikipedians so that we can start up a Adventure Quest Wikiproject. Thank You. SupaSoldier 01:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Itunes20s9.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Itunes20s9.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Invitation
I've seen your edits to articles related to the Bay Area, such as Albany High School, so I was wondering if you'd like to join WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area. It's a WikiProject that focuses on improving Wikipedia's coverage of the Bay Area. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading! — Emiellaiendiay 08:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Welcome
P.S. Right now we're focusing on tagging everything Bay Area-related. You can pitch in by adding to the top of talk pages of articles. Think of anything Bay Area-related — it helps if they're obscure local articles no one else might think of. Click here if you need more information on assessing articles. Thanks!

— Emiellaiendiay 22:21, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Your screenshot of VandalFighter
On the VF page I noticed your screenshot of the application. When I run it, it doesn't use the OS X interface elements like yours, but instead has a nasty, grey, Windows 95 looking one. Are you doing anything particular to make it look like this, or is it an odd configuration on my end? Matt J User 21:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I just downloaded 3.3, and that has the OS X interface, I guess if I want to use 3.5, I'll have to bear the nastyness. Matt J User 09:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have further investigated, and it seems that every version up until the newest version in the 3.5 download page uses OS X widgets. Matt J User 11:07, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Qnextmacosx.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Qnextmacosx.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 19:38, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Jumpaclass
This is an invitation to use WP:BAY's Jumpaclass option for improving articles. If you're working on any Bay Area-related stub, start, or B-class articles, simply add their names to the list, and if any of the articles improve a class within a week, you'll be recognized for your contributions. If you have any questions about how it works, post on the talk page or on mine. Thanks for reading! — Emiellaiendiay 21:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

POTY 2006
I am voting for the Lunar Libation image (4). --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 20:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my fumarate problem
Well that error spread because I just copied it from one picture to the next. I tell you, I checked over these diagrams 8-9 times, but missed this! thanks! Adenosinetalk 09:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Transcription
A mutation within the protein coding sequence isn't generally expected to affect the synthesis of said gene's mRNA, but can certainly affect gene translation. If one considers the term "gene" to encompass all of the important non-coding sequences associated with each proteins's DNA coding sequence (promoter regions, splice sites, polyadenylation sites), then the answer is most certainly yes. -- Scientizzle 01:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * According to my 6/e Campbell, that stuff doesn't count as part of the gene, and our articles concur. Does that mean transcription would not be affected by a change in the genes? --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 05:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I haven't a Campbell laying around, but the gene article certainly lists the promoter as part of the gene, as well as the statement "Most genes contain non-coding regions that do not code for the gene products, but regulate gene expression". Truthfully, when most people say "gene" they really mean "coding sequence". A point mutation within the coding sequence on the DNA is fairly unlikely to cause a change in the transcription of that mRNA&mdash;but it's not impossible. We've only scratched the surface in terms of how expression is regulated. A point mutation may alter, say, a DNA methylation site (CpG site), changing the expression. (On a larger scale, see Fragile X syndrome). Some genes produce protein products that regulate their own expression and a point mutation altering the amino acid sequence could affect that interaction. If one does not restrict discussion to point mutations, but considers deletions, inversions, insertions and duplications, the odds are greater that a given alteration of the DNA sequence my affect transcription.
 * Outside of the protein-coding sequence, altering an initiation site, termination sequence, polyadenylation site or any number of regulatory, non-coding RNAs, could change mRNA expression of one or more genes. -- Scientizzle 20:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Helpme
m-Phenylenediamine needs the image placing fixed, and I don't know how to do it. Help please? :D
 * Take a look now. Xiner (talk, email) 03:05, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Chinese Indonesian Article
Why did you undo my changes (removed 'China totok' from transliteration list of 'Indonesian Chinese') on 31 May 2006? I explained the removal in the Talk page of that article. I've removed it again for now, if you think that is not appropriate, can you post a reason in the Talk page of the article? Thanks Benny Benjamin 14:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Further reply on my talk page. Thanks. Benny Benjamin 08:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Hea
Sorry, am trying out some new monobook features and you were a random user, didn't mean to commit the edit though. Happy editing! — xaosflux  Talk  23:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Merck-information.com
Thanks for pulling me up on my 6+ month old edits! Looking at Special:Contributions/75.11.169.96 shows that they added a series of Google adsense links over a number of Merck articles. Merck-info is not an official site and the links added nothing over the official site already linked. It seems as though Merck-info has since lost their Google program though, probably for abuse, as there are no links any more! --Steve (Stephen)talk 04:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Isodesmosine.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Isodesmosine.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Rhododendron Image is not identified
Please provide some idea of which rhodendron this is. Otherwise it is likely to go away in the long run:

Your VandalSniper Application
Good day, and thank you for applying to use the counter-vandalism tool VandalSniper. I am pleased to inform you that your application has been accepted, and you are now approved to use the tool.

Feel free to download the program, and be sure to read the features guide, if you have not already done so. Please bear in mind that VandalSniper is a powerful program, and that misuse may result in your access being withdrawn by a moderator.

Don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions, and welcome to VandalSniper!

Kindest regards, Anthøny  (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Help Vandalism
I am contacting you because you not only have edited the page Spells in Harry Potter, but are experienced in anti-vandalism. There is an IP that is continuously placing incorrect information onto the page (accidentally I think). I reverted this normally the first time, but when they entered in the same information, I reverted it as vandalism and gave them a substitute warning (which wouldn't format correctly for some reason). In the warning, I not only warned him, but explained calmly why their edit was incorrect. They then continued to edit the page, and I to revert it as vandalism. I gave them a more serious warning after this, and not long after, my user page was vandalized. I gave them a pretty serious attacking others warning (which I probably should have made less severe) and now I have no clue what to do.  •Malinaccier•  01:43, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:CVU status
The Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to and/or  status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 17:01, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Methylaluminoxane
Please explain why you restored an incorrect diagram for MAO? It's a poorly-defined substance, drawing it as a polymer is simply wrong. Iridium77 19:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi. MAO is a co-catalyst which is used to alkylate and ionize metallocene and post-metallocene catalysts. These are used to generate polyolefins, which is why it "shows up" in an article about polymerization. MAO can not form a polymeric structure - the electronics aren't right. Current best estimates are that it forms oligomeric structures, based around cyclic structures. There's a whole field of research trying to work out what the mixture of species in MAO solution are, mostly led by Tom Ziegler using DFT to investigate it.

MAO is pretty much a "black box" - it works, and that's all that really matters. It was discovered by accident when a grad student accidentally hydrolized TMA. The unpredictability of MAO is why most structural investigations into cation structure use perfluoroarylborate initiators instead of alkyl aluminiums.

If you want to see the evidence, read the Marks Chem Rev from 2000, or any of the more recent Ziegler papers discussing modelling. Iridium77 22:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Drug abuse ref?
I'll restore it since I was hasty about the edit. --Specter01010 23:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * No, you're not messing up my archive, I'm just ridding of comments that will not be of importance to both of us. --Specter01010 23:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Wait? Why did you remove my meta tag? I like to keep it there so that most people wouldn't be confused about my talk page. --Specter01010 23:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Lindowsos091.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Lindowsos091.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:01, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Usbovercurrent.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Usbovercurrent.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Tiger for Intel
There's a MacBook in my household running Tiger as I type...--NapoliRoma 01:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Tiger was not sold in an Intel version, unlike Leopard
 * OK, I think I get it: there is a Tiger for Intel, but it was never sold as a separate product: it was only available as a preinstall on Intel Macs, since they were introduced when Tiger was the current release. Is that right?--NapoliRoma 01:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Compromised?
Hello there.

Your account appears to have been compromised since it just went on a rash of very uncharacteristic vandalism; I have blocked it indefinitely. If you want, you can establish your identity and we can unblock it. &mdash; Coren (talk) 20:46, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, its nothing personal. The relevant ANI post is at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Well, we're starting to think there's nothing wrong here and you should be unblocked whenever. In the mean time, you can create an alternate account to take part in the discussion (We are blocking you because we think your account is compromised, not because your a vandal or anything like that, so it's okay)--Phoenix-wiki (talk · contribs) 21:08, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * To the extent I was involved in setting off this unfortunate chain of events, I do want to tender my apologies. I knew just enough German to have been horrified by the articles' headers, but not enough Mozart to know that these were real pieces of music. I will point out that I did try to make sure that other editors were involved, in case it was my own ignorance at fault; and I didn't expect anybody to just jump in and block you right off the bat. I hope this has not interfered with your work in Wikipedia since (as I said) you have a good record here. -- Orange Mike  |  Talk  21:31, 4 December 2007 (UTC) (a fellow Mac user, still running his tangerine iMac)

I've removed the unjustified block on you. I hope that what you take away from this incident is a good laugh. Behold the self-fulfilling edit summary. :)  r speer  / ɹəəds ɹ  21:37, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem! Just a case of 2+2=5, understandable with recent events I think! Happy editing,  BLACK KITE  21:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of VectorMagic
A tag has been placed on VectorMagic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc (talk) 06:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ucb logo.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Ucb logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Featured sounds
I noticed that you have participated in Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder(talk) (Contrib) 00:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cpu-z.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cpu-z.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NWO Pat Rob.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NWO Pat Rob.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 00:54, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account, because after a review of some of your contributions it appears that we can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of reverting vandalism: and believe you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Rollback feature and Rollback school. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Cheers, NoSeptember  19:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cpu-z.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Cpu-z.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User editcountitis
A tag has been placed on Template:User editcountitis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:76.19.82.136
Hi, I noticed this user's edits to Fluid statics at the same time as you but you made corrections before me. However, I do think that your comment on the user's talk page was way over the top. Assuming good faith (from what I can see the edit was correct) is, as I'm sure you're aware, a big part of Wikipedia. Berating a newbie for making what appears to be an honest mistake on their first edit is a sure fire way to put people off our encyclopedia! I apologise if I come across as a busy-body but I thought it had to be said. RaseaC (talk) 00:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I do care to explain
It seems that the "fourth Nelly Furtado album" is made up, and given an inappropriate name. As much as users might want to hear Nelly Furtado sing that, its not true.  Not hing 4 44  00:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chax.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chax.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:22, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

moved from archive 1
Erm...have no idea if this is the way to pass on a message, but I appreciate your bang-on-the-money moderation of my slightly (okay massively) daft addition to the wiki. Top marks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.254.251 (talk • contribs)

Wafa Sultan
What I have reverted is a clear vandalism... I have removed bad references and added a good reference..... please read before you judge —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.13.9 (talk) 21:13, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

The Time link that was removed .... it was part of the <!- > tag... it was a comment that does not show on the screen... also Sydny Times never syas she was sunni - so adding this is a vandalism --148.87.13.9 (talk) 22:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Please don't lie. The Jerusalem Post article says More sensational is the fact that the outspoken 49-year-old is herself a Sunni Muslim. Well, she was born and raised as one, at any rate. and the Sydney Morning Herald, at page 2, says The Syrian-born Sunni Muslim Dr Wafa Sultan has recently completed a visit to Australia. Your source cites Wikipedia as a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.216.113.163 (talk) 23:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No I was replying to him, not to you, M1ss1ontomars2k4. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.216.113.163 (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Anon. talk page reverts
WP:Don't restore removed comments. Comment modifications to User talk:74.75.198.161 can be reverted, but comment removals can not. 63.3.21.129 (talk) 21:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Wafa Sultan vandal
Can you please report Special:Contributions/148.87.13.9? He won't stop. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.216.113.163 (talk) 23:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No I think he's very familiar with how things go in Wikipedia. When someone removes sources from the Jerusalem Post and the Sunday Morning Herald and replaces them with a reference from some crappy website that mentions Wikipedia as a source, it is pure vandalism and not edit warring. Never mind, I'm report him myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.216.113.163 (talk) 23:28, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Assume good faith
Are you claiming that I am a troll. I hope not. If so, you should probably look up what a troll is. - Diligent Terrier (and friends) 23:43, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Alright, so I wasn't trolling, I just apparently don't have a clue about Wikipedia's policy according to you. Now I get it.  - Diligent Terrier  (and friends) 23:29, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Your status message and Vandalism Level counter
Please tell me how you got these, please! -- Mr. E. Sánchez  Wanna know my story?/ Share yours with me! 01:20, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Re Your comments on T:MP
Please remember to be civil, calling "one of those people who are nuts about getting about getting rid of Scientology" (even if it is true) isn't nice. ff m  22:59, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Allegations of apartheid deletion notification
Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of Israeli apartheid. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO (talk) 18:08, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Pokemon Red Blue Glitch City
Hi, you voted a while ago in favour of some mention of Glitch City in the Pokemon Red/Blue article. Unfortunately, despite admin saying a Glitch section would be ok, the main editor of the page is turning it into a war, constantly deleting it despite sources and Pokemon-culture relevance. If you have an interest in keeping this kind of interesting information in wikipedia, please come over to Pokemone Red and Blue and help get the small Glitches section reinstated. Regards, MKULTRA333 (talk) 19:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

TI-BASIC
The recent edit you added to TI-BASIC puzzled me when I read it. Of course both of us know about recursion and how TI-84 programs can call on each other while running, I personally don't believe it contributes to the article and it might seem a little too in-depth when the article mainly exists to inform about the general idea of TI-BASIC. If you want to perhaps re-edit it or revise it in some way, I think it would be more beneficial. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. -Delux- DeluxNate (talk) 15:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * After having several of my own edits involving examples of programs removed, it seems contradictory that admins would allow you to put a lengthy program on recursion (of all things) on the article. I'm just saying it seems pointless to the article, when all you would have to state is that recursion is possible. Good call on the / sign. Wasn't recalling the same thing. -Delux- DeluxNate (talk) 17:43, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * That's okay. Sorry for getting in your way. I hope you understand, but that's the way I was treated so I figured I was doing the right thing. -Delux- DeluxNate (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

ATA standards
Thank you for your input! The issue of "support for solid state drives" now seems to be moot, thanks to Tom94022's insight - I have pointed out to Ramu50 that the lede never said anything about "support", only what exists. Ramu50 has now shifted to other fronts. If you are interested in being stubborn (yet AGF) in a new arena you might take a look at the last few subsections at talk:Advanced_Technology_Attachment. Jeh (talk) 08:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Janusgreen.png‎
Just so you know, I have added the disputed chem tag to an image you uploaded, Image:Janusgreen.png‎, because it is missing a nitrogen atom in the central ring. I replaced the image in Janus Green B with a different one that I found on Commons. If you want to correct your image, feel free to just remove the tag. Thanks. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area roll call
Hello from WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area!

As part of a recent update to our project main page we are conducting a roll call to check which members are still active and interested in working on bay area related content. If you are still interested in participating, simply move your username from the inactive section of the participant list to the active section. I hope you will find the redesigned project pages helpful, and I wanted to welcome you back to the project. If you want you can take a look at the newly redesigned:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app Community Help.png|25px|]]Main Page
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app Login Manager.png|25px|]]Talk page
 * [[Image:Broom icon.svg|25px|]]Cleanup listing
 * [[Image:Template icon.svg|25px|]]Template list

As well as the existing pages:
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app clean.png|25px|]]Assessment
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kedit.png|25px|]]Article Worklist
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kdict.png|25px|]]Watchlist
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear action editdelete.png|25px|]] Deletion sorting (California)

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page, and add it to your watchlist, if it isn't already.

Again, hi! -Optigan13 (talk) 07:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bill Parker (MIT)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bill Parker (MIT), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Bill Parker (MIT). Thank you. Cheers, CP 02:28, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Robert V. Gentry
An article that you have been involved in editing, Robert V. Gentry, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Borock (talk) 06:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Welcometovti.png
Thanks for uploading File:Welcometovti.png I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 02:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Tilp2window.png
Thank you for uploading File:Tilp2window.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Rhododendron2.jpg
File:Rhododendron2.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Rhododendron2.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:56, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cpu-z.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Cpu-z.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:33, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Barttickets.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Barttickets.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. 293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Methylaluminoxane.svg
Hi there

I've deleted your image File:Methylaluminoxane.svg because it does not represent methylaluminoxane well. That this file exists causes problems because having no image listed causes any image with the same name as the article title to be displayed. Thanks for your understanding. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 17:54, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Chax.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chax.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:15, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chax.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Chax.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leck mir den Arsch fein recht schön sauber


The article Leck mir den Arsch fein recht schön sauber has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Articles content is questionable and trivial, seems overall dubious to have an article about this particular composition. How much more notable can it be? Its more of a vulgarity then a work of musical art.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 06:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

I also have a duplication concern per this article : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lick_my_ass JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 06:59, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles 05:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:KE logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:KE logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 08:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Mannosamine.svg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mannosamine.svg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. DMacks (talk) 22:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed Image Deletion
A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion
One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Algámitas


A tag has been placed on Algámitas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Algamicagrat (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Acetylcholine3d.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Acetylcholine3d.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Dielectric responses.png
Thanks for uploading File:Dielectric responses.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 14:48, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

dbw
dbw Plauph (talk) 05:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox emission nebula
Template:Infobox emission nebula has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IC 442


The article IC 442 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't seem to meet WP:NASTRO. No significant coverage in studies, not in a catalogue of note (Messier or NGC), not visible to the naked eye, and not discovered before 1850.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StringTheory11 (t • c) 19:36, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Quixotic plea
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. —  06:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Gitmo on the Platte
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash; Gitmo on the Platte &mdash;has been proposed for merging with 2008 Democratic National Convention. If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. SecretName101 (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

MUMPSVAX™ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MUMPSVAX™. Since you had some involvement with the MUMPSVAX™ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
Hello M1ss1ontomars2k4! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! &mdash; MusikBot II  talk  17:10, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Virtual TI


The article Virtual TI has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG for not including any references to significant coverage in reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.