User talk:MAANY20

Hello, I'm Melcous. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Joanna Pickering. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 23:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for this MAANY20 (talk) 11:43, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Mandatory paid editing disclosure
Hello MAANY20. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MAANY20. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:11, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your update. The page is a female protected page crediting females in areas of success that do not warrant any commercial payment and the page has already lost information I feel should be protected and as females where we are trying to get more equality which is an issue on wikipedia. This comment been generated by updating the actress in this category won an acting award. This is not biased information and notable on an acting page and clearly relevent. Any credits or extra names which have been generated before was in keeping with the wikipedia page instructions to make sure relevant information which is adding necessary knowledge to its audience is described. Let me know if I can be any further help and thanks for your work to keep these pages in best order and fair practice we can. MAANY20 (talk) 11:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)