User talk:MAmes

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. I have reverted your addition to Carla Martin again.

Blogs are not acceptable sources for material in Wikipedia; policy requires that all material be verifiable from reliable published sources. This requirement is especially important for article about living persons. -- Donald Albury 02:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I have reverted you again on Carla Martin. Blogs are not acceptable sources. Please read the policies at Verifiability and Biographies of living persons -- Donald Albury 12:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Your revert just removed the the {citations missing}template I added. This is a violation of our rules. Stop adding unsourced or improperly sourced material to this article. If you continue to do so you could be blocked from editing. -- Donald Albury 12:34, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not edit the article while the {in use} template is on it. I am trying to make the article conform to WP policies. I will remove the template when I have finished in a little while. -- Donald Albury 13:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not make major edits to this article, you are adding additional old articles, which do nothing to add substantive content to the biography. MAmes


 * I was not adding content, I was adding references and citations, and removing unsourced information potentially detrimental to the subject of the article, in accordance with the policy at Biographies of living persons. -- Donald Albury 14:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I have once again reverted your edits because all of the web links you added were non-working. I also reverted the unsourced material you added. Do not add unsourced material, and please make sure that any web links you use as citations actually work. -- Donald Albury 15:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Donald, rather than deleting them, if you had read the AP article I sourced, you would find the direct quote in there from Roscoe Howard. Why did you delete that? It was in the article! I am going to return that article, because it is not unsourced, and the link DID work.
 * Stop inserting the same unsourced material, to wit, "The court never heard testimony from Martin, after the prosecutors made their representations to the court during the hearings of March 13-14, 2006, regarding the court's sequestration order and her work in the case." If you have a source for it, cite it. -- Donald Albury 01:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

And stop "deleting" information that is sourced, Donald Albury, it seems you have a personal mission here to cite to as many distorted and negative sources as possible-which is unnecessary. Strange that you seem to want to ardently devote such time to this biography, when there are dozens and dozens of Washington DC biographies that are crying out for revision because they are biased, and yet you and yours don't seem to want to touch those-it looks very suspiciously as if there is more than a little misogny and/or a personal vendetta involved here with your "edits."

As for the unsourced material on the prosecutors, it cannot be libel if it is true, and all the prosecutors, particularly David J. Novak, are under current investigation by the Department of Justice for prosecutorial misconduct arising out of this matter. That is a true fact, and facts are not, and never can be, libel. MAmes