User talk:MAntoni

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Antoni Lange.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Antoni Lange 1.jpg. The copy called Image:Antoni Lange 1.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:W 4 wymiarze.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:W czwartym wymiarze.JPG. The copy called Image:W czwartym wymiarze.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 14:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Miranda Lange.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Miranda Lange.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Mikołaj Sęp Szarzyński
I noticed you re-added the description of MSS as a "metaphysical poet" after I removed it. As far as I know, "metaphysical" is only applied to English-language poets from a slightly later period. Sure, MSS resembles them in many ways but to the best of my knowledge the most common designation for this style in Polish is "Baroque" (in the same way that the equivalent Spanish style is called conceptismo and the Italian equivalent secentismo or Marinism - or both are subsumed into the category "Baroque" too). On the other hand, if you have a reliable source that describes MSS as a "metaphysical" then please add it. Thanks. --Folantin 15:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * That's fine then. Dziękuję. --Folantin 16:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Antoni Lange
Sure, no problem. I know very little about Lange, but I'll be happy to have a look at the style of the article. Cheers. --Folantin 12:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:W 4 wymiarze.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:W 4 wymiarze.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Moved material from Monogamy in Christianity to Christian views on marriage
This is a courtesy notice to you as a frequent editor of Christian views on marriage. I moved some material to the article. I placed a summary of my thinking on the Talk page. In brief, I think the moved content would very much benefit from integration into Christian views on marriage, as well as stylistic reformatting to the style of that article, removal of interpretive components (unless they represent cited viewpoints), and redaction of primary source material. Perhaps you will be able to edit the material to bring it up to snuff. Regards,FeatherPluma (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Michał Gołębiowski moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Michał Gołębiowski, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Michał Gołębiowski
Hello, MAntoni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michał Gołębiowski, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)