User talk:MBMConsultancy

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Greater Gabbard wind farm. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 08:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Greater Gabbard wind farm. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. Pontificalibus (talk) 08:44, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Reconsider !  08:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

The information I am providing is correct and publicly known. It is in the press and is part of this project. Why is this information not allowed?
 * The content is not directly relevant, and it also violates the WP:SPAM policy. - Reconsider !  09:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The article is about Greater Gabbard wind farm and the information you added would not be useful for readers wanting to know more about the windfarm. Your addition of this material despite this fact, and also given you links to the company in question, is against our promotion policies. Consider, would another editor having no connnection to MBM Consultancy want to add this information to the article? -- Pontificalibus (talk) 09:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

n answer to your comments. Yes. The information is relevent. Reason - This is phase two of the Greater gabbard project. Phase 1 came from China and Phase two from Denmark which we designed. Thus, the information is totally relevent. WE are fully involved with the shipwoners, BBC, Fluor, Siemens, and all players. Thus I think all parties involved would not object to the information. Also they would also agree that they would also see the information as an enhancement to the success of their project as it shows innovation and achievement to the project. So I say again, YES, it is relevent. YES - others would add this information. YES - it is factual. YES - it is welcomes by all parties involved

You have not provided any evidence to show you are a registered author for Wikipedia. Please do so.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 09:38, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Pontificalibus (talk) 10:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Heavy lift, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on Wikipedia.  Teapot  george Talk  10:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Pontificalibus (talk) 10:35, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a few moments to create a new account with a username that represents only you. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may ask for a review of this username block by adding the text below this message. Thank you. - Dank (push to talk) 14:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)