User talk:MC2554/Mosque of Cristo de la Luz/Sedvabs Peer Review

@MC2554Your bibliography section is formed quite well. However, I think you should add your references in your reference section. Sedvabs (talk) 00:14, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

The previous article is written well, as you must know. However, I think you could add information that is not in the article already. For instance, you could add a section at what types of activities the Mosque was utilized for, and why it is so famous. Sedvabs (talk) 00:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Turn your sources into citations using the "Cite" button, and you can insert footnotes from there, which will help you avoid plagiarism when the article goes live. Sedvabs (talk) 00:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

While reading your article, I really enjoyed the first sentence in the "Architecture" section, as it discusses the size of the building. I plan to utilize this in editing my own article, by adding average sizes of Iznik Pottery. Sedvabs (talk) 00:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Add more information from your sources. For instance, your bibliography has "Heather Campbell, History of Toledo, Spain. (Britannica, Revised 2023)" linked, which can be helpful by adding additional information on the history of Toledo itself. You could add "Toledo is considered most representative of Spanish culture, and its historic centre was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1986. Its rocky site is traversed by narrow, winding streets, with steep gradients and rough surfaces, centring on the Plaza del Zocodover." I think this will benefit your contribution, and the future readers, as they will know. more about the complete origin. Sedvabs (talk) 00:44, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Please make sure to incorporate your own two sources linked in your bibliography to your "live article" to establish credibility. You can also add them to your reference section! Sedvabs (talk) 00:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Opening the article, it states that it needs citations added to the information. You could try finding the source(s), or replacing it with one of your own! Sedvabs (talk) 00:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Attention: Peer Review
Hi @Ptcoyle17 and @MC2554! I wasn't sure if you were able to see these comments from @Sedvabs so I tagged you here. ProfTern (talk) 02:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)