User talk:MCJstyle

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --AW 21:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

March 2007
Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Xnuala 15:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Armenian Genocide
Your recent edit to Armenian Genocide (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Avi 16:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Umaal
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Umaal, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Umaal fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: not english To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Umaal, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Umaal itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

August 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Turkey. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 23:41, 30 August 2012 (UTC)