User talk:MCarrier18/sandbox

Peer Review
I’m doing a peer review for the ERTH 4303 class and the first thing I noticed, basing it off the five elements that make a good Wikipedia article is that the flow is a little awkward, there is one sentence followed by a paragraph on hydrothermal processes, but the layout doesn’t make it clear as to what that first sentence is attributed to. The grammar/flow is choppy but it is a rough draft, so the final will have improvement. Three of the sources are just encyclopedia sources, not peer-reviewed journal articles. The content seems neutral and it is somewhat balanced in terms of content per section.SophieL3 (talk) 18:41, 8 March 2018 (UTC)