User talk:MD. JAKIR HOSSAIN 166

June 2019
Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zak Tales have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 06:28, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Zak Tales. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —RainFall 06:38, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Zak Tales, you may be blocked from editing. Shenme (talk) 06:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Zak Tales. Almy (talk) 18:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Zak Tales. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 18:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)