User talk:MDPMHG

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi MDPMHG! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 04:54, Wednesday, June 26, 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm Aranya. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Shruti Seth. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! Aranya (talk &#124; contribs) 04:52, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Edward Harwood ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Edward_Harwood check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Edward_Harwood?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to John
 * Philip Furneaux ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Philip_Furneaux check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Philip_Furneaux?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Henry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Unblock request
Hello I'm not a sockpuppet account sir MDPMHG (talk) 07:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, I think that you are User:AR.Dmg, which means that you have created a new account in order to evade a block. Denying this will not be helpful. If you want to appeal, there is Guide to appealing blocks, and you would type at the bottom of this page. However, be aware that repeatedly making false unblock requests can result in loss of your ability to edit this page, and it is generally recommended that you return to your original Wikipedia account to discuss the unblock there. ST47 (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I do have some questions for you. Feel free to answer here or back on your original account:
 * Can you please tell us, as well as you can remember, all of the Wikipedia accounts that you have used?
 * Your recent edits on Sanjivani and KSK seem to have met some resistance. For each of those articles, do you know why other users reverted your edits? Is there anything you could have done other than revert back?
 * If you are willing to follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, it is possible to be unblocked, potentially under the standard offer that 331dot mentioned. Potentially sooner, especially since it looks to me that you are trying to constructively work on articles rather than continue with the same thing that led to your original block. However, we need to understand that you will work with other editors in the future, and follow the policies, guidelines, and community consensus in your editing, rather than create sockpuppets and use edit warring. ST47 (talk) 09:02, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

sir as you asked questions. I would definitely like to answer all questions before you unblock me.
 * As you asked how many account do I have used or remember. I have starting Wikipedia using, and . But during that time I was in school and was immature don't know much about Wikipedia. So I did many mistakes I accept that I have been warned many times. I won't hide anything from Wikipedia community. I created the first 3 account as I was immature. Don't know much about Wikipedia. But from the past account  I was working in contributing Wikipedia, and was trying to follow Wikipedia policy. You can contact . As I was taking assistant from sir about guidance If I do something wrong through my edit. He also guide me to don't do edit warring and discuss it on the talk page. I had lost all the access of my previous account sir, I accept my mistake that I was immature I was involved in sockpuppets and edit warring previously. I will rectify my mistake if I get the change. The first four account was loged in a cell which has been destroyed in an accident. And my  was blocked from editing so I can't request from there. As with the new account , I promise to accept my mistake and I will acknowledge all my accounts in these account. And I can assure u that I won't repeat my mistake which I used to do previously like sockpuppets, edit warring or being rude with ip user. I will abide by the Wikipedia guidelines and policy
 * the second question Sanjivani and KSK. I accept that I missed mos and infobox of television which I didn't followed properly. I shouldn't revert the edit. But I should discuss with my fellow editor about my edit if they revert it and if their edit summary doesn't justify it. And also thanks them if my guide me and help contribute Wikipedia.

At last I would like to say that I am going to take the ownership of all my account and would mention it if I get unblocked. I will definitely follow the Wikipedia guidelines and policy and would not repeat it again, I have understood why I have been block from editing Wikipedia. It a Encyclopaedia which everyone refers and so we need to neutral point of view to create good article and as sir said about Standard offer. I will totally rectify each of my mistake which I had done till now sir. I know I had been dishonest at first, I'm extremely sorry for that. I would not do this again. Thanks for your consideration. MDPMHG (talk) 10:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)}}


 * I'm about to log off for the day, but I did want to thank you for your replies, and I'll check back tomorrow. For any other reviewing admins: The previous account User:AR.Dmg had some issues with images and pages getting speedied, but nothing that resulted in a block. Neither this account nor the previous one made any attempts to re-create the Vivek Chourasia article (which was the cause of the original block), and they're currently being honest and appear to be acting in good faith. I'm inclined to unblock with an indefinite single-account restriction and a short term 1RR restriction. Any comments or suggestions from other unblock reviewers? ST47 (talk) 10:43, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Hello will I be get unblock sir. I'm ready to accept my mistake and rectify it. Along assuming and assuring Wikipedia that I won't repeat again ever. Thanks for your consideration sir. MDPMHG (talk) 10:50, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
(edit conflict) You've worked pretty hard to convince us we shouldn't unblock you. You knew perfectly well you weren't permitted to set up additional accounts to WP:EVADE your block. Given your wilful and deliberate violations, it's highly unlikely any admin will unblock you at this time. Your only realistic chance is to earn back the community trust by following the process outlined in WP:SO. This requires six months with zero edits, across any accounts. Failure to do this is likely to result in your indefinite ban from Wikipedia, given your long history of abuse stretching back these past 18 months. --Yamla (talk) 11:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

I pretty well agree with you, but ST47 expressed the intent to unblock. So, I've pinged them for further discussion. Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't object to others unblocking this user. I certainly wouldn't, given the non-stop block evasion, multiple sockpuppets including ones not listed here (for example,, , , , ). I think this person is a poor candidate for unblocking, has been abusive since September 2016, and has continued to be less than forthcoming here. But again, I don't object if others want to lift the block. It's easy enough to reblock the account if there's any further abuse. --Yamla (talk) 12:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Sorry, , , , I really missed out as I don't remember the account which Yamla sir mentioned. I agree with you sir I started editing Wikipedia around 2016 I won't hide. I forgot about the exact number of account, I created thank you for reminding me. Yes I agree with you I had been associated with multiple accounts. And was involved in sockpuppetry along with edit warring with fellow Wikipedia editor. I do try to rectify my mistake from my previous account user:AR.Dmg and was taking guidance from if I was wrong at some point with my edit. And my current account user:MDPMHG, you can see my contribution but created few articles, fews pages tagged for deletion, fews non-free images uploaded, and minor some edit. And when ever situation arises of some kind of edit warring I tried to discuss on the talk page. I respect the work of everyone whether ip user, editor or admin. We are here to contribute and help Wikipedia grow. Yes I'm a poor candidate as I had breach the Wikipedia policy which say to have a neutral point of view and has to acknowledge and declare his or her additional account which I did not did. yamla, Dlohcierekim, 331dot, I too agree with you, that I should wait according to WP:SO, and then would again request to  you all. I accept my mistake. I was not admitting that I have other account, I was dishonest with 331dot. I'm really bad user who should not be with Wikipedia, as I'm not making useful contribution, but do take a look at my contribution on both the recent account which I have  and  as of now. As I have access to both this account only. I have lost access to all the rest of my account. Do give a last chance to show me that I can be a good candidate from being bad candidate. And I assume and assure in good faith that I will not give a chance ever to complain or report to block me. And I will greatful to Wikipedia community if I have been granted a last chance to prove myself. And as Dlohcierekim sir said to stop request I'm sorry that I did reply and interfere because you want to discuss with ST47 sir and Yamla sir, this unblock request. I won't reply anymore and wait for the results of the discussion. Thanks for your consideration. MDPMHG (talk) 13:56, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I am not sanguine about unblocking, but believe in the sovereignty of admins (within the rules and regulations pertaining thereto), if any wish to unblock. We are often forced to act/not act w/o adequate information. I leave it to ST47, and will support (if half-heartedly), their decision. I have confidence in the judgement of my peers and colleagues. It is easy, as you say, to reblock.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:18, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you and I do believe the same in the sovereignty of admins (within the rules and regulations pertaining thereto), I respect all admins work and I'm sorry for replying to the discussion proceedings. MDPMHG (talk) 15:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Query: MDPMHG You've lied to us by denying that you have used multiple accounts. When I asked you if you had multiple accounts, you didn't answer me, and when I asked you if you were being paid to edit, you skirted the question by saying that"I'm not working with anyone." So I'll ask you again: Are you or were you being paid to edit at Wikipedia? Note that being a paid editor is not a violation of our policies. Being a paid editor and engaging in promotion is, and being a paid editor and failing to disclose that that you are being paid, is. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Answer: yes I agree sir that I lied to you when you asked me about multiple accounts if I use or not. I accept my mistake sir. But I'm a undergraduate student I'm 21 now. And I'm completing my BCA. I'm not working, nor would ever edit Wikipedia for money. I want to assure you that I won't breach Wikipedia policy of being a paid editor and hiding it ever.  And I loves editing and its hobby  and  you can alsi check my both accounts contribution which access I have as of now. I have lost all previous account login access. So I can't apply unblock from those accounts sir. And I did reply to your questions which you ask me in your talk pages and you had tagged me. I accept that I missed to reply but I didn't skip to answer you sir. I am not a paid editor. And I never engage in promotion of article or has being doing paid edits. And never would be doing Promotion of any article. I just want to focus and follow on Wikipedia policy and guidelines. And if I have been a chance to prove myself I will not be involve in any violation of Wikipedia policy and guidelines sir. Yes I was dishonest with you and 331dot. But I understand my mistake which I done I am accepting my mistake and want to rectify it sir. Thanks for your consideration. I have faith in the discussion of Wikipedia admins. Thanks for your consideration. --MDPMHG (talk) 17:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I agree with the rest that all of the block evasion last year is just too recent. Per WP:SO, if you can demonstrate that you will not continue to engage in block evasion by making no edits for six months over all accounts, and then return at that point to request unblocking, then you can be unblocked. ST47 (talk) 21:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * yes I agree that I evade a block by creating a new account. I was dishonest with you all admin, I accept my mistake sir, Do look at both of my account contribution. I only had 2 account access only  and, I will not make any unconstructive edit which are not helpful. I accept I was involved in edit warring which I tried to rectifed. I had lost the access of all my account created. With the 2 account I tried to be a genuine editor user:AR.Dmg and user:MDPMHG. I accept I tried to evade a block. I had breach the Wikipedia policy. I'm not a paid editor. I do assume I should be given a 2nd chance on the contribution basis or ground. I assure you all that I will rectify all mistake. Would not be ever involved in sock puppetry, edit warring, violation of Wikipedia guidelines and policy and I would breach Wikipedia terms and condition. That all's, do look on all the perspective for just once. I respect your work. And it's a kind hearted request. Do me a change. Thanks for your consideration. --MDPMHG (talk) 01:52, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bhakharwadi Sab.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bhakharwadi Sab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ANA Sab.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ANA Sab.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DPL Sony.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DPL Sony.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ETRETR SB.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ETRETR SB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JNPPK.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JNPPK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Singham 2019.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Singham 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)