User talk:MDSRóg

Regarding your edits to Christopher G. Donovan
Please read WP:CITE, WP:Biographies of living persons, and WP:No original research. Any addition to articles about living people must be totally sourced. No source was provided for the assertion that Donovan is an atheist, or that his family does not know. Any addition to any article must not state anything not in the source. The one source you did have, for the statement that Donovan was involved in a number of scandals, the news article never says that he was involved in a number of scandals, but only brought up additional problems with an existing scandal. Ian.thomson (talk) 13:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

A summary of site guidelines and policies you should be aware of
Looking over more of your edits, I'm seeing problems with the following policies and guidelines: Ian.thomson (talk) 13:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, using, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology, and editors should not be here to "right great wrongs."
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.