User talk:MDesjardinss

This user will be away from Wikipedia for an unknown amount of time because of business he has to take care of.(MDesjardinss (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)) Hi. I have reviewed your report at AIV. Rather than just deny it, I simply commented on the shared enthusiasms of yourself and - Boxing, NASCAR and reporting The359 to WP:AIV - and asking other editors to review my notes. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, MDesjardinss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:42, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

However..
The person is right to say you accidentally re-reverted back to a source that is wrong. The person in the article is still alive, and someone added a source saying that the person is dead. Yes, the source talks about George Michael being dead, but its a different George Michael. So, here is the confusion. Optakeover (Talk)   19:38, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah I realized that a little bit late. The George Michael who died was a sports broadcaster and someone else had put the source in, then when someone removed it without a reason, that is when I reverted it back.(MDesjardinss (talk) 19:39, 24 December 2009 (UTC))
 * I've also talked to the anonymous user not to call you a vandal just because you made a mistake. Optakeover  (Talk)   19:42, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, its all good man thanks. I'm also new to this site, so I'm still learning the basics.(MDesjardinss (talk) 19:43, 24 December 2009 (UTC))
 * Also, notice the talkback template. Once you have finished reading the person's reply on his talkpage, you can delete the talkback template from your talkpage. I can help you if you want. Cheers, Optakeover  (Talk)   19:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

That's ok man, I will leave everything here except the obvious vandalism and hoaxes. I just want to do my best to become an admin. That is my goal.(MDesjardinss (talk) 19:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC))

User talk:Sfan00 IMG
Im really confused here, you just templated a long time user who is removing stale deletion captions of images. He was not removing speedy tags, and even if he was you shouldnt have given a level three warning as the first notice. Can you please explain your actions? βcommand 21:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC) His last fifty or so edits have been removing speedy deletion tags. They read something like this, "This image is a candidate for speedy deletion."(MDesjardinss (talk) 21:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC))
 * Your mistaken. he is not removing speedy tags. If you take a look at what hes actually doing instead of blindly reverting you will see that he is removing deletable image-caption which should only be used on images that are tagged. what Sfan is doing is cleaning up old tags from images that where either not deleted or moved to commons (in which case the image is still usable but was deleted here). You where out of line with your actions. In the future before templating a long term user you might want to ask nicely because more times than not they know what they are doing are are correct in doing it. I think you owe Sfan an apology for your comments as they where out of line. βcommand 03:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry for that mistake.(MDesjardinss (talk) 07:57, 25 December 2009 (UTC))

What is a "sockpuppet"?
Re your query on my talkpage; please click WP:SOCK. There are two interpretations that springs immediately to mind - you and the ip address that previously reported The359 to WP:AIV are the same, and that sockpuppet is a little too strong suggestion that you created the account to further the dispute you had as the ip, or that you are an knowledgable editor who is using a "new" account for a purpose without disclosing your editing history. Given that you were able to find and use AIV so readily, yet say that you are unfamiliar with the term sockpuppet (which is an internet meme, not only a WP term), tends to persuade me to the latter... However, it is the Season of Goodwill and I am only going to note my thoughts here - and suggest that you withdraw and reconsider your gameplan (and preferably abandon it). Salutations of the Season! LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:00, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 00:23, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Huggle
I think huggle did not pull the latest edit (unless I force it to) and so our edits "clashed". This made huggle warn you. -- Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 01:47, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Ok. Now I know why some editors here don't use it. Sorry for the misunderstanding.(MDesjardinss (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC))

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Thechroniclesofratman for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. The359 ( Talk ) 04:28, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

?
I have no idea what you're talking aboutAhmedfarhat (talk) 20:22, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Your edit to Pink discography in which you just removed things without a reason is unconstructive.(MDesjardinss (talk) 20:25, 25 December 2009 (UTC))

I think you should really consider getting a life :) how constructive is that? Very! Right? Oh, I thought so! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmedfarhat (talk • contribs) 20:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

If I get blocked, I won't be able to use this account no more, or what exactly happens. I've been getting a lot of warnings lately and I don't know how it goes.. Ahmedfarhat (talk) 20:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC) It depends on the type of vandalism you are committing. You might get one block and be let back on, but if you get blocked a second time, it will probably indefinite.(MDesjardinss (talk) 20:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC))

and what if I create another account? Ahmedfarhat (talk) 20:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC) I learned just this week that creating another account after having your other account blocked is called a sock puppet account and that is against Wikipedia policy. Just stick with this account. Just try not to do anything wrong.(MDesjardinss (talk) 20:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC))

But I already have like 6 accounts! I never received any warnings for that reason. After all, how would they know it's me!? Sorry I sound really stupid but I feel so lost! I mean, if I say some bad word to you, like if I swear to you, I get blocked, right? Then I can't edit anything. But I create another account and edit all I want, and swear all I want and when I get blocked I create a third one.. But it's not that easy, is it? Ahmedfarhat (talk) 21:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC) You do know that is against the rules and we can block permanently for that, right?(MDesjardinss (talk) 21:15, 25 December 2009 (UTC))

I'm curious
Is there a reason you left this warning after User:Minimac94 had already left a warning for the edit? Regards  Tide  rolls  21:41, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but two of the warnings were a week old. There is a reason the warnings are given in an order. If a report is made to AIV and the examining admin determines that there has not been sufficient warning, the report may be declined. Unless there are extenuating circumstances it's best to apply warnings in the proper order. Regards  Tide  rolls  21:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Hey if you keep accusing me of defamation of character, I will make you eat that in court. He did you are just ignorant of it. Aaron Peskin Came to San Francisco General and tried to pull the I.V. out of my arm. He came to my school and tried to have me kicked out of school, because I was homeless. Are you really defending him?Tobynixon (talk) 04:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC) Well bring it on then. Look I don't care who you are, but defamation of character is not allowed here. You are your only witness, so therefore none of us believe you.(MDesjardinss (talk) 04:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC))

Witnesses include the then Chancellor, Dean of Activities, A San Francisco City College cop and several of the then City College Associated Students Representatives. As for the scene he made at the hospital those are witness by the San Francisco Sheriffs Department. So continue to call it defamation of Character. Don't know who Aaron Peskin is? I hardly believe that. Tobynixon (talk) 04:34, 26 December 2009 (UTC) Sir, then why don't I see them on here? Look, I have never heard of Aaron Peskin until you mentioned it. I had to survive Communism, I know times get hard, but complaining to me won't help.(MDesjardinss (talk) 05:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC))

What does all that mean hmm? The rhetoric about communism? What is it that you are talking about? Aaron Peskin's talk page was where I commented. Get your story straight. Why aren't they there? Why aren't all the details of his political career? Why are not they there? Huh, they are facts, like where he was born, what he did at the Board of Supervisors meeting where I spoke. (Like taking the video of that meeting and editing it, refusing to hand over that tape to President Obama upon request.) Why aren't my achievements outlined, why are you not allowing me to publish them? I formed the first Pagan Religious organization in like 1993? Because you are prejudiced toward my religion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobynixon (talk • contribs) 05:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC) I survived Communism, I'm sure you can survive not having one sentence of your life put on a talk page. What are you talking about? This is all conspiracy theories and not facts! Give us a source!(MDesjardinss (talk) 05:53, 26 December 2009 (UTC))

Sir! This has nothing to do with me being prejudice toward your religion. What are you talking about? Just provide sources to your problem and maybe, just maybe we will believe you.(MDesjardinss (talk) 05:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC))


 * Administrator's comment - Everyone calm down please. If this continues to escalate in this manner I'll be forced to block the both of you. Tobynixon: don't make legal threats. MDesjardinss: Stop dropping warnings on Topynixon's talk page. Now can we pleas try to act a bit more civil? It isn't necessary to get this heated over an encyclopedia. --Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 15:35, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Velirs wiki page
Hello.Why have you removed my contribution?... You did a revert. Why ?.Thanks.Rajkris (talk) 16:22, 26 December 2009 (UTC) Edit made was unsourced.(MDesjardinss (talk) 17:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC))

I planned to put references. Ok i will add them.Rajkris (talk) 20:17, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, someone called Chola yadava is vandalising this wiki page. I have provided many references written by different scholars to what i wrote. Please do something to prevent such vandalism. ThanksRajkris (talk) 23:54, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
Removal of false content from biographies, even without an edit summary, has never been and will never be vandalism. You clearly have no clue what constitutes vandalism, and you should not be patroling recent edits in an attempt to handle vandalism until you can grasp the basic concepts of vandalism. This is not the first time I've had to tell you of this, Zaxby. The359 ( Talk ) 17:46, 26 December 2009 (UTC) Yes and I apologized for those mistakes 359, I did not blame it on other editors. I also thought edit warring was disruptive too, since that you have been blocked for it before. So obviously I'm not the only one who has made mistakes around here.(MDesjardinss (talk) 17:51, 26 December 2009 (UTC))

Question re usage of vandalism1 template
Hi. I'm curious about your use of the vandalism1 template on my talk page, especially without providing a link to the article to which you're referring.

The only edit I've made recently was to remove a grammatically-incorrect, redundant word in an article on Shannon. It was a single-word edit, and I marked the change as minor. I've re-applied the change. If you'd like to discuss it, please feel free - but I'd appreciate the courtesy of a link to the article and the non-use of a vandalism template. Thanks! uglybugger (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Final Warning
This is your last warning, if you continue to incorrectly template editors, you will be blocked. --Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 19:58, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 18:32, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

I have once again posted a retort on Aaron Peskins talk Page. Do not remove this one. Talk pages are just that I have taken all this into consideration and dropped the whole mess onto my blog. But no more accusing me of lying using your moderator status on this website, do you hear me? Talk pages are for 'talk', for personal experience iterations. In my opinion, my personal opinion is he is a jerk, I have only my personal experience to judge his character I knew the man personally, most people who know the Mr. Pesky knows he is a self centered megalomaniac who oversteps boundaries and breaks all the rules, of his job. That ended his political career. That much is plain, cited and referenced. You leave me alone. Don't mess with me. I was homeless, now I just received a National Science Scholarship and will receive a full ride scholarship to a certain law school in Berkeley if I can continue to keep my G.P.A. above 3.85. I want no more reverts from you mister, or you will see the side of me that Aaron Peskin saw before he was fired. Like you he was not an expert in Law, but an expert in real estate values. Tobynixon (talk) 20:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

__NOINDEX__ NW ( Talk ) 19:18, 30 December 2009 (UTC)