User talk:MDragunov

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, MDragunov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Brigade insignia of the United States Army. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! — Ed! (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

thank you!
You do really nice graphic work! Do you take requests?--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 09:21, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, i do.

Graphic Lab interview at The Signpost
Hello MDragunov. You seem active at the Graphic Lab, so I wanted to invite you to participate in The Signpost's interview of the project. The report is being written by Rock drum and will be published September 13; this is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Please stop by and answer some interview questions here. Thank you,  â�³ ono

Air Defense Artillery School redesignation
Hello, I need your help. the ADA school no longer falls under the 6th ADA. It has been redesignated to 30th ADA. So the 30th ADA SSI has to be created and updated to the ADA School page. --Shovonma17 (talk) 03:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Mono at 03:20, 17 August 2010 (UTC).

Logo of Central African Airways
Hello MDragunov, I've just noticed that you uploaded a new version of the CAA logo. Previously, I launched a discussion here concerning the color that had been used in the official logo. So far, I couldn't find any reference that any particular color had been favored, so I guess we should stick with the black one. Did you upload the new version only for the purpose of replacing a jpg with an svg file, or do you have any deeper insight that might prove that this dark shade of blue had indeed been the official one? I appreciate your thoughts and comments. Best regards --FoxyOrange (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * There is another problem with upload. Where exactly did you get this image from? Your source clearly is not sufficient, as this seems to be an online upload depository. Please add the proper source. --FoxyOrange (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I am just do it because of Antemister's request on Graphics Lab/Illustration workshop. Send all questions to him.

February 2013
Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:Racial Map of Europe E. Banse 1.JPG. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. But why original version is fine? I'm just corrected color's on old image, and reuploaded as JPEG, for User:Kintetsubuffalo's request on Graphics_Lab/Photography_workshop
 * Ah, I hadn't seen that previous upload. But unfortunately that isn't okay either; it's the same problem. It's certainly not GFDL (unless the original Wikipedia uploader is the reincarnation of Mr Banse); and I see no reason to assume it's public domain either. There might be a case for using it under WP:NFC though. Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of disputed non-free files
Hello, one (or more) of the images you uploaded that fell into the Non-free Scout logo nocontent category have been re-tagged with Di-fails NFCC. This means that the image may be deleted unless rationale for its inclusion on Wikipedia can be provided. This change was made due to a deletion discussion for the first template. If you have any questions, please reply here (ping me with ) or on my talk page. You can see all of the files at Category:Disputed non-free Wikipedia files as of 21 January 2016. Thank you for your time. Primefac (talk) 03:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)