User talk:MEMEMEMER

October 2021
Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Criticism of Judaism, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your sources are discussing Orthodox Judaism, not Judaism in general.  Doug Weller  talk 19:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Renault Trezor has been reverted. Your edit here to Renault Trezor was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://asphalt.fandom.com/wiki/Renault_Trezor, https://asphalt.fandom.com/wiki/Renault_Trezor_(upgrades)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Consider this a final warning. If you remove validly cited content from an article again without providing a good reason in the edit summary or the talk page, you will be blocked from editing. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:48, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ''All your recent edits are either redundant, unverified, improperly explained, useless, or incorrect. Please be much more careful.'' Drmies (talk) 01:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Bro,

People are spreading lies about Islam saying that Muhmmad had a "mental" ilness when he did not and he reaveled "sword" verses. why is wikipedia so shitty racist? I'm breing honest here not about the "tone" part. Like what is this.How would it feel if people put pictures of jesus in Hell as you stupid wikipedia editors did on the criticism of Muhmmad. This is filthy propaganda sponsored by wikipedia. No don't be quiet not responding to me. I'm serious why are these sources added in the "criticism" of Islam unrealiable and when you try to fix the mistakes you stupid donkeys people say "its not reliable" I don't care if your gonna block me just answer why are you admins a bunch of white propagandists promoting silly sources as "reliable".


 * "Bro", Wikipedia reports only what is found in reliable sources. Your removal of text that is cited to reliable sources is unacceptable, as is your abusive language above.
 * If you have a problem with the reliability of a source, discuss it on the talk page of the article. If you simply disagree with a source, you won't get any traction, especially if the source is written by a recognized scholar in the field.
 * You absolutely cannot delete anything that offends you personally. See WP:NOTCENSORED. Wikipedia is not censored for the benefit of any group. Wikipedia articles have images that can be considered gruesome, racist, pornographic, or offensive to someone in various ways.
 * As stated in Talk:Muhammad/FAQ (which you should read), Wikipedia is not singling out Islam or Muhammad. Wikipedia has content offensive to other religions, such as Piss Christ and Jesus Dress Up (offensive to some Christians), the 1868 photograph shown at Bahá'u'lláh (offensive to Bahá'í Faith followers), the account of Scientology's "secret doctrine" at Xenu (offensive to Scientologists), or Timeline of human evolution (offensive to believers in Young Earth creationism). It isn't possible to write a neutral encyclopedia while simultaneously submitting to all sensitivities.
 * So if something offends you, that isn't a reason to remove it. You can remove contentious statements if they have no citations to sources. If a contentious statement cites a source, you need to discuss it on the talk page. So far, you have not done so, you have only posted complaints (see this edit of yours). You have not made any constructive criticism or suggestions for improvement. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Aisha. Favonian (talk) 16:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)