User talk:ME Researcher

Speedy deletion nomination of "Nothing but a Miracle"
A tag has been placed on "Nothing but a Miracle" requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fribbulus Xax (talk) 13:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm Beeblebrox. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Moose without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Beeblebrox (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * i see that you did leave a comment on the talk page, but your comment rather misses the point of what the material you removed is for. A WP:HATNOTE is a way of letting a reader know what to do if they arrive at a page after searching a term, only to find it is not the page they were looking for. It is a navigational aid to help readers who may be a bit lost. So, someone looking for information on the Bull Moose Party might just type in Bull Moose and find themselves looking at the article on the animal, and the hatnote tells them how to find the content they were actually looking for. And you did not address in your remark that the term Alces, which is part of the scientific name for a moose, also redirects there and the hatnote also explained that there was disambiguation page if you happened to be looking for one of the other meanings. And finally, you also removed a valid page protection template with your edit, which is a way of informing users that the page is currently under a form of edit protection. So, you did not remove an explanation of why a moose is not a political party, you removed three pieces of information that were there to help our readers navigate and understand the project. Please be more careful in the future. thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)


 * You may also find it useful to get up to speed on Wikipedia talk page guidelines as your remarks were misplaced and unsigned, both of which have now been rectified. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:44, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586579121 your edit] to Sulfoxaflor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:04, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586579395 your edit] to Sulfoxaflor may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:07, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=586579631 your edit] to Sulfoxaflor may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:10, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)