User talk:MEdgerton

St. Anton Shoehorn Principle
With regard to your recent new article St. Anton Shoehorn Principle, it seems to be in good faith and a principle that Milton Friedman and similar-minded people would hold to, but you have not provided any sources (See WP:CITE) for the article, and a Google search for the phrase "St. Anton Shoehorn Principle" yields zero results. It would appear to a neutral observer that this is a non-notable or invented phrase, and unless you assert its notability (see WP:NOTE), the article is most likely going to be deleted. –Skomorokh 22:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

St. Anton Shoehorn Principle
A template has been added to the article St. Anton Shoehorn Principle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)