User talk:MEmreCelebi

Welcome!
Hello MEmreCelebi and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Please read WP:COI and WP:Reliable Sources. I reverted your recent additions because they are uncited. They are too fresh to be considered WP:Reliable Sources.

Your additions are so called WP:CITESPAM, apparently focused on promoting your own work via Wikipedia.

In particular you make some claims:


 * Recently, M. Emre Celebi of the Louisiana State University in Shreveport investigated the application of k-means clustering algorithm to color quantization [2] . He demonstrated that an efficient implementation of k-means with an appropriate initialization strategy outperforms a variety of state-of-the-art quantization methods with respect to distortion minimization.

However, you obviously are not the first to investigate the use of k-means for color quantization: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=color+quantization+k-means which seems to be a pretty standard technique today. However, that paragraph seems to imply so, so it is close to a lie, unfortunately.

'''Please do not just re-add your article. This may get it blacklisted.'''

You are however welcome to improve the articles on their actual content, but please don't just try to add your own works to it. Once they are a widely cited related work, it may then become appropriate later (and hopefully, some other editor will recognize the importance of the work and add it). Thank you. --93.204.122.175 (talk) 17:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)