User talk:MFTG

January 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 1971 Michigan Wolverines football team— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1971 Michigan Wolverines football team. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:58, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Srochk castle


A tag has been placed on Srochk castle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

It's too short, doesn't contain any refrences.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —‎ Lost Whispers talk 08:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Srochk castle


The article Srochk castle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Very little context, not enough indication of notability, no sources. I declined speedy deletion as no speedy deletion criteria are satisfied, but as it stands right now, not enough here for even a decent stub.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 16:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)