User talk:MGMT90018 2015S2 prosocial orientation/sandbox

“A prosocial orientation refers to a set of dispositional attitudes, cognitions and behaviours that successfully potentiate social interactions” [1]. Im not sure if having this inverted references is sufficient alone... we should probably add more to this? Or have it go, or reworded? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 388827MGMT (talk • contribs) 00:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Just posting some links to some preliminary research. Have a look before the next meeting so you're all experts by then.

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=1306d9ea-ffb7-4969-a21f-162b913022e2%40sessionmgr110&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=92547700&db=bth

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=8ef009cb-9810-47c8-a5a4-9e6b96e4a0c9%40sessionmgr110&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=97633812&db=sih

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=b529f694-7700-4be3-894e-ac8ea0f665c8%40sessionmgr198&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=26058287&db=cmedm

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=9c545d85-4a99-48ef-8617-2ead5c648d6d%40sessionmgr112&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsjsr.41683886&db=edsjsr

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=be33ba4a-bf23-4dcd-8238-a501b9b15f9f%40sessionmgr198&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=102491399&db=edb

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=19fe5694-7667-4b6b-891d-68faf1a11b5f%40sessionmgr111&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=65118808&db=sih

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=f628106b-0f67-4ba4-8063-cfff28b2372b%40sessionmgr114&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=35279012&db=s3h

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=b112a0d3-3ade-467a-ab7b-1149a5b65923%40sessionmgr112&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=21952723&db=cmedm

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=b224123e-2e9c-41dd-8186-926114a80752%40sessionmgr115&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=S0167487015000823&db=edselp

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=d9d47f88-10c7-4829-a627-f05b6e91685d%40sessionmgr115&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=27404369&db=bth

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=f377ab15-af15-4874-a019-e2306d16a0b6%40sessionmgr113&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=101964026&db=edb

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=1f0cd71a-dd3d-4512-aa27-91c50c763db3%40sessionmgr114&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=EJ571492&db=eric

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=5b8f39b4-8abc-4570-8ca9-82fd3711ee3b%40sessionmgr111&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsoai.786475819&db=edsoai

http://eds.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/eds/detail/detail?sid=68930a66-2dfe-4479-9c3b-0e7fbbf022c8%40sessionmgr110&vid=0&hid=126&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=edsswe.oai.services.scigloo.org.33194&db=edsswe

Also, should we make a "measurement" section? Seems like there has been a lot of studies and they use different measurements to define prosocial orientation.

684312MGMT (talk) 12:36, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Good links! I agree that we should have a measurement section. 686044MGMT (talk) 12:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes. A measurement section would be great, we could find the most effective/common from more credible journals and use them as an example. 541830MGMT (talk) 12:21, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

everyone read this, there are seperate pages on each section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria710220MGMT (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

hey guys, i updated and added links to the entire outcomes section. I think its done now unless anyone finds some new awesome info. 710220MGMT (talk) 14:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Hey team I have figured out how to add pictures to the page if anyone wants me to add anything or take something out give me a yell, lachy ¬¬¬¬ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 686044MGMT (talk • contribs) 02:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Can we combine Conditions/Moderators with Causes? 537648MGMT (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Yeah that's a good idea.

Here a few useful links for our final editing: Good article critera- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GACR#Criteria in case you also couldnt get the original link from the instructions to work Style manual- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style Some good article nominations- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations/Instructions

According to the style manual only the first word in the title should be capitalised. Ie- Prosocial orientation.

541830MGMT (talk) 01:53, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

It looks like the sentence "RSA has also been proven to release oxytocin in the body when individuals feel warmth or trust towards those they interact with" should have a reference. Thoughts? 541830MGMT (talk) 04:14, 25 September 2015 (UTC)