User talk:MICHAEL JIMMY ATQ

March 2015
Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Amritsar because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Now please don't remove or change anything what I have edited... — Preceding unsigned comment added by MICHAEL JIMMY ATQ (talk • contribs) 19:00, 20 March 2015‎

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, MICHAEL JIMMY ATQ. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Amritsar, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 18:56, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Amritsar. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. ''The relevant section is WP:SEEALSO. This section is for links to other related articles. If it is a red link (has no article), then it should not be listed there.'' Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 19:28, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Amritsar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:23, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:43, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, violation of the three revert rule and promotion, as you did at Amritsar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  S warm...   &mdash;X&mdash;  20:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)