User talk:MISHCLIF

Copyright problem: Painting The Invisible Man
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Painting The Invisible Man, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.amazon.com/Painting-Invisible-Man-Rita-Schiano/dp/0979534704, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Painting The Invisible Man and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Painting The Invisible Man with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Painting The Invisible Man.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Painting The Invisible Man/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Painting The Invisible Man saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! John Nagle (talk) 22:11, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

More on copyright; conflict of interest guidelines
Hi. I just wanted to let you know that the version of the above article you started at the temporary page was also a copyright violation, duplicating text from this press release. I understand from your note at the talk page that you are an employee of the publisher, but as the above indicates we need verification of permission to run text from other sources. Since we do not require proof of identity at account creation, we cannot otherwise legally verify that you have the right to release this material under GFDL. As permission has not been verified in these cases, both pages have been deleted.

Another issue here, however, is that your employment by the publisher may constitute a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. --ElKevbo (talk) 19:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  JGHowes   talk  18:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sweet Bitter Love
Hello MISHCLIF, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on July 25 2008, Sweet Bitter Love, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:68.177.147.48 (page has mainspace links, and 8 edits). This has been done because the page is a blatant advert that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:68.177.147.48. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 12:01, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Painting the Invisible Man for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Painting the Invisible Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Painting the Invisible Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rita Schiano


The article Rita Schiano has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A WP:Before is showing nothing that could be used to satisfy WP:N. This is an advert to sell her stress relief books etc."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Szzuk (talk) 05:28, 4 January 2019 (UTC)