User talk:MISSION 33

External Links added against Policy ( 0001 )
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kilukkam has been reverted. Your edit here to Kilukkam was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=44m9s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=1h7m18s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=2h3m12s) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I appreciate @XLinkBot for giving care for my account and giving time to correct our mistakes.
 * Arguing for doing the above mistake my account was blocked. So I was given details in the Blocked Section of this Talk Page. Therefore this section is closed and more details will be given in Blocked Section of this Talk Page. For your further checking I has added some details below:
 * Promotional Edits
 * I have not added any links or edits in any wiki pages for my business or advertisements or persenol benefits. I have tried only to add links related to the article. You can test the links..
 * The external link(s) I added in Kilukkam (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=44m9s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=1h7m18s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=2h3m12s)
 * The external link(s) I added in Ponkathir (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLNF7jFXSf0)
 * The external link(s) I added in Anubhavangal_Paalichakal (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOpoG6CObyM)
 * Other users also added such links which are related to articles in wiki pages.For example external links in Ponkathir page. I don't wan't to affect this user, I tried to say that my links are also related to the article.
 * I ask for your presence in removing this block and all through...
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 17:55, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Promotional Materials added ( 0003 )
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Atlantic306 (talk) 02:26, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I appreciate @Atlantic306 for giving care for my account and giving time to correct our mistakes.
 * Arguing for doing the above mistake my account was blocked. So I was given details in the Blocked Section of this Talk Page. Therefore this section is closed and more details will be given in Blocked Section of this Talk Page. For your further checking I has added some details below:
 * Promotional Username
 * I understand the mistakes about the username and the username is changed following the policies.
 * I won't add such usernames again.
 * I made mistake in usernames as I was not knowing about usernames.
 * Promotional Edits
 * I have not added any links or edits in any wiki pages for my business or advertisements or persenol benefits. I have tried only to add links related to the article. You can test the links..
 * The external link(s) I added in Kilukkam (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=44m9s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=1h7m18s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=2h3m12s)
 * The external link(s) I added in Ponkathir (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLNF7jFXSf0)
 * The external link(s) I added in Anubhavangal_Paalichakal (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOpoG6CObyM)
 * Other users also added such links which are related to articles in wiki pages.For example external links in Ponkathir page. I don't wan't to affect this user, I tried to say that my links are also related to the article.
 * I ask for your presence in removing this block and all through...
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 18:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Globally renamed Centralvideos to MISSION 33 ( 0004 )
Globally renamed Centralvideos to MISSION 33 -- Deep fried okra  ( talk ) 13:15, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

your choice of formatting is jarring. The color formatting hurts the eyes. If a new user name is needed, please submit through Special:GlobalRenameQueue and mention me in the request. I cannot read this page. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 07:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I appreciate @Deepfriedokra for giving care for my account.
 * I doesn't need any new username. MISSION 33 is a fixed Username.
 * My formatting for my username is for disturbing people like you. (Don't disturb a user especially a new user, as they are only studying laws and etc..)
 * I will change the formatting for username only after you unblock this account. You need to study how to behave.
 * The problem for reading this page may be a problem of your eye. Test your eye.
 * You and such words are mentioning all administrators, reviewers, etc..
 * I ask for your presence in removing this block and all through if your eye is ok...
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 14:54, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Is their a problem with the name "MISSION33"? I renamed them from the CORPNAME "Centralvideos," under which they were originally blocked, to "MISSION 33". MISSION33 is not, as far as I can tell not a COI username. Will be happy to make another rename if needed. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 07:46, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I was confused. The new user name is fine. I am also fine with unblocking based on the current appeal, but I leave that up to another admin if further questions need answering. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hai @Anachronist and @Deepfriedokra.
 * Is there any problem with unblocking MISSION 33. If there please give a reply. Will it take a long time to get unblocked.
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 06:29, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked ( 0005 )
 Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy. You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Request 1

 * I appreciate @Anachronist for giving care for my account and giving time to correct our mistakes by blocking.
 * I has given an approval for Unblock below. Please go through it and make necessary movements for Unblock of my account.
 * Here are other some details for you..
 * Promotional Username
 * I understand the mistakes about the username and the username is changed following the policies.
 * I won't add such usernames again.
 * I made mistake in usernames as I was not knowing about usernames.
 * Promotional Edits
 * I have not added any links or edits in any wiki pages for my business or advertisements or persenol benefits. I have tried only to add links related to the article. You can test the links..
 * The external link(s) I added in Kilukkam (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=44m9s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=1h7m18s, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmfCAURZ-s4&t=2h3m12s)
 * The external link(s) I added in Ponkathir (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLNF7jFXSf0)
 * The external link(s) I added in Anubhavangal_Paalichakal (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOpoG6CObyM)
 * Other users also added such links which are related to articles in wiki pages.For example external links in Ponkathir page. I don't wan't to affect this user, I tried to say that my links are also related to the article.
 * I ask for your presence in removing this block and all through...
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 11:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (This Unblock Request was Declined due to a confusion of an Administrator on username) →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 16:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I Thank @Daniel Case for giving care for my account and giving time to respond.
 * But I am sorry, I doesn't understood your this edit. Can you explain this edit..
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 10:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * What I meant was: read what's written below. It's that simple. Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (due to a confusion of an Administrator on username) →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 16:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I Thank @Daniel Case for giving reply.
 * I understood what you meant.
 * I has updated the request of @Anachronist in approval for Unblock.. Please go through it and unblock my account faster.
 * I ask for your presence in removing this block and all through...
 * I am waiting for your reply (that your account is Unblocked).
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 15:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (due to a confusion of an Administrator on username) →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 16:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

You have not followed the instructions in your block message to propose a new username, or explain your association with Mission 33. You also need to explain clearly what you intend to do if you are unblocked; "add more details" the way you were doing before would not be acceptable. To reviewing administrator: Edits like this are clearly promotional, suggesting the editor's purpose here is promotional. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (struck out my confusion, new name was changed to MISSION 33). ~Anachronist (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I appreciate @Anachronist for giving reply to my talk and helping for my Unblock.
 * I has updated the approval for Unblock above according to your suggestion. Please go through it and make necessary movements for Unblock of my account.
 * Here are some details for you..
 * Promotional Edits
 * The links I added are not for any Promotion.
 * The links which I added are from faithfull site (YouTube).
 * The links were added only to the External Links of the Page.
 * The YouTube Video I added does not have any Ads.
 * You can have look at the links which I added in this. The links are purely related to the articles.
 * Other users also added such links which are related to articles in wiki pages. For example external links in Ponkathir page. I don't wan't to affect this user, I tried to say that my links are also related to the article.
 * Promotional Username
 * I changed my Username Centralvideos to MISSION 33.
 * The username MISSION 33 is not related with any Organisation or companies.
 * According to username policy we can't add our name to username.
 * I used the word ' mission ' to indicate a mission of cleaning, editing and more in wiki.
 * As the username mission is already taken, I took a number ' 33 ' for unique.
 * Future Contributions if I get Unlocked
 * I like to add more details and correct articles.
 * For Example; When I am referring to some articles in Wikipedia, if I see some mistakes I will like to correct it(From the date of blocking till now I has referred nearly 100 articles, Wiki has lost many edits as they were many mistakes in all articles I referred).
 * I can't say which type of articles I will edit in wiki.
 * I didn't and will not edit for any Promotion.
 * Create some missing articles.
 * Contribute to more wiki organisations slowly.
 * Trust me, I wan't readers to get maximum details about the articles.
 * I ask for your presence in removing this block and all through...
 * I am waiting for your reply (that your account is Unblocked).
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 15:13, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (due to a confusion of an Administrator on username) →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 16:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Please don't edit or remove declined unblock requests. I have reverted your change to the appeal that was previously declined. You made it look like Daniel Case declined a different appeal. Please open a new appeal below. Also, what you wrote about promotional edits is irrelevant; the video may not be promotional but the way you added it gave a clear impression that you were trying to promote a film. Also, YouTube contains many copyright violations; we don't link to videos not owned by the copyright holder, so be careful what you link to.
 * Also, your username is still the same. You need to formulate your appeal exactly as the block message shows if you want your username to change. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (struck out my confusion about name change.) ~Anachronist (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I appreciate @Anachronist for giving reply to my talk and helping for my Unblock.
 * I has added new approval for Unblock below according to your suggestion. Please go through it and make necessary movements for Unblock of my account.
 * Here are some details for you..
 * Promotional Edits
 * I will not add any links that are not original.
 * Promotional Username
 * I requested for a new username as per block messege and @Deepfriedokra had chanded it.
 * Now I am requesting for Unblock only.
 * I changed my Username Centralvideos to MISSION 33.
 * The username MISSION 33 is not related with any Organisation or companies.
 * According to username policy we can't add our name to username.
 * I used the word ' mission ' to indicate a mission of cleaning, editing and more in wiki.
 * As the username mission is already taken, I took a number ' 33 ' for unique.
 * Future Contributions if I get Unlocked
 * I like to add more details and correct articles.
 * For Example; When I am referring to some articles in Wikipedia, if I see some mistakes I will like to correct it(From the date of blocking till now I has referred nearly 100 articles, Wiki has lost many edits as they were many mistakes in all articles I referred).
 * I can't say which type of articles I will edit in wiki.
 * I didn't and will not edit for any Promotion.
 * Create some missing articles.
 * Contribute to more wiki organisations slowly.
 * Trust me, I wan't readers to get maximum details about the articles.
 * I ask for your presence in removing this block and all through...
 * I am waiting for your reply (that your account is Unblocked).
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 07:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * (due to a confusion of an Administrator on username) →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 16:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Unblock Request 2
As the blocking administrator, I have no objection to unblocking, but I would like another administrator to review this. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your good words. Sorry for disturbing @Anachronist. I would like to know that this unblocking process would take how much time to get completed. →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 09:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Congratulations, you are unblocked. Please avoid promotional edits. In particular, we don't generally cite primary sources (which includes most youtube links). See WP:PRIMARYSOURCES. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hai @Anachronist, My account is not unblocked. I can edit only my User Talk page. Expiry of the block is given as 'no expiry set'. →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 05:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that. Deepfriedokra had agreed to unblock you, and I thought he did already. You are now unblocked for real. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)


 * It's good to hear. I thank @Anachronist @Deepfriedokra @Daniel Case for taking care and unblocking my account. Why can't I use Visual Edit? I will seek your help when required. Can I close this section? →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 17:16, 17 September 2021 (UTC)


 * While you were blocked, you were prohibited from removing declined unblock requests but now that you are unblocked you can clean up your talk page however you see fit. As to why you can't use Visual Edit, I don't know. I never use it myself. I prefer the source editor. You can set your default editor in your user preferences. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:26, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Talk 1
Hai @Anachronist, Talk pages are not unblocked as usual. I can't access Page settings, Visual Editor and some more in Talk pages of my, others, articles, etc... →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 03:55, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Your account isn't blocked. Some articles are protected from editing, however. What are you trying to do, and on what page? ~Anachronist (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Is my Talk page also protected. →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 05:17, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * No. If it was protected, you probably couldn't write messages on it like you have been doing. ~Anachronist (talk) 07:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Then why can't I change page settings of my Talk Page. →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 07:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Talk pages have no settings. Your user account has settings. What exactly are you trying to do? ~Anachronist (talk) 07:19, 18 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I am just looking on. I can't edit any Talk pages of articles, other Users and my in Visual mode, but I can edit My User Page and articles in Visual mode. Can you check why it is? →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 15:51, 19 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I have no idea. I cannot check technical issues any better than you. I did notice that your talk page no longer has section editing links; I had to edit the whole page to reply here. I suggest you remove the sections about your block or archive older parts of this page. Village pump has a page for reporting technical issues but you will have to be very specific and give examples of what you see that is wrong. But see if someone responds to your help tag. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Talk 2
Hai Technical Helpers, I can't edit some pages (My Talk Pages, Unprotected Template Pages and some more) in Visual Editor. My Talk page doesn't have section editing links and New Section Links. Can any Technical Helpers Solve it? →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 08:13, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi. I don't the visual editor supports talk pages and templates. Please take a look at the Discussion tools beta feature and your discussion editing settings for new section link. — LauritzT (talk) 10:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * But I can't add section edit links, new section links in my talk page. →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 12:17, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * You cannot add section edit links because your signature (which is inappropriately using a template, contrary to our rules on the issue). I have substed your template use, removed the magic words, and would strongly advise that you update your signature to note use User:MISSION 33/Signature. If you want more help, change the help me-helped back into a help me, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 13:35, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * @Primefac: I understood what was the problem. I has updated the template User:MISSION 33/Template/Signature and replaced your edits. Thank you very much for making understand me my mistakes.


 * @Anachronist, @LauritzT and @IVORK: It was a problem in a template. Thanks for responding me.
 * →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 16:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Transcluded templates in Signature ( 0007 )
Still shouldn't be using templates in your signature. Primefac (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * @Primefac: Hey, that template is made by MISSION 33 and from good source. If I use this template the source data is good to see. I have seen other users using such templates. Can you explain the problem about using it? →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 17:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * If you have seen other users doing this, then they need to change their signatures as well. WP:SIG disallows templates in sigs (and gives reasons), so please change your sig. Primefac (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes, your signature works just fine without the transcluded template. Please remove it. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Ok, I understood what is the problems. I will not add templates in signature. Thank you →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 03:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Aircraft ( 0008 )
Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I has cancelled my membership request in WikiProject Aircraft as this is a sub-project of 'WikiProject Aviation'. I will be member of the main projects and consider all sub-projects and other projects equally. If you want any suggestions or guide on projects, please make a request like this. →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 17:23, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Category:MISSION 33 Edits ( 0009 )


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Category:MISSION 33 Edits, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 01:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)


 * You can't have a category devoted to yourself. Your contribution list contains all of your edits. Wikipedia has tens of millions of registered accounts and you can't create new systems just for yourself. Your user talk page is the most chaotic user talk page I have ever seen. I would archive the top 50% of it and stop giving each discussion a number. It's peculiar and not in a good way.
 * If you have questions about user pages, signatures or editing on Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry for creating Category:MISSION 33 Edits. I have a doubt - How to categorize user sub-pages and some other for fast using? Is there any ways for that. Can you please explain. And I didn't understand what is unordered in this Talk page, the numbers are used for fast listing of discussions and anchor. →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 06:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)


 * @Liz: Why there's no reply? →' MISSION 33 ( talk ) ' 11:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)


 * You can view all your current user subpages at Special:PrefixIndex/User:MISSION_33/. If you want to create a separate list of those in your userspace that's fine, you'll just have to manually add any new pages to it instead of using categories.  Angry Harpy   talk 11:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:MISSION 33 Templates has been nominated for deletion ( 0010 )
Category:MISSION 33 Templates has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Category:MISSION 33 has been nominated for deletion ( 0011 )
Category:MISSION 33 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:40, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1 ( 0012 )
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Malayalam films before 1960, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bahadur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)