User talk:MJ1984

Welcome!
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 07:48, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles on academic journals
Hi, some helpful tips can be found here (and some resources are listed on my user page). Hope this helps. --Randykitty (talk) 13:50, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Overleaf (March 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiAviator was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Overleaf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Overleaf, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Overleaf Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiAviator&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Overleaf reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiAviator (talk) 15:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Overleaf (March 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JavaHurricane were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Overleaf and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Overleaf, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Overleaf Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:JavaHurricane&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Overleaf reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Java Hurricane  09:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

I really do not understand. You are asking me to provide more sources on an article that already has 66 references! I don't know what more I can do to fulfil your requirements. I have cited an official page from the UK government to prove when the company was launched. I have cited the original statements from the partners of Overleaf, including some of the top universities in the world. Please let me know specifically which statement is not properly supported in this article?

I understand that some of the sources used in the draft page for Overleaf are coming directly from the Overleaf website. But every single claim in the draft is supported by several independent sources, always including reliable sources. So as long as the information is confirmed by independent sources, I do not see why it is not allowed to cite the Overleaf website.

If you look at all the other companies listed on the Comparison of TeX editors, they barely have one reference, if not zero outside from their own website. If you want to be fair on this, please remove all these pages from Wikipedia. I do not see why those pages meet better the requirements for publication than the extensive collection of information I have provided here. Please let me know how I can this page published finally. I have already spent several days on it, and I do not see any way to fulfil you requirements.

MJ1984 (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!


Hello, MJ1984, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC) Sm8900 (talk) 15:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * How to add those all-important references
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Signpost, our newspaper.