User talk:MJClapham

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Shuttleworth v Cox Bros and Co (Maidenhead), please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shuttleworth v Cox Bros and Co (Maidenhead), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:29, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sidebottom v Kershaw, Leese & Co Ltd


The article Sidebottom v Kershaw, Leese & Co Ltd has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced and appears to be copied from a book

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 00:33, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Leahy v Attorney-General for New South Wales


A tag has been placed on Leahy v Attorney-General for New South Wales requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDDJS (talk) 01:48, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Morice v Bishop of Durham


A tag has been placed on Morice v Bishop of Durham, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 01:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Staffwaterboy Critique Me 01:50, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

We don't need direct reports of every case. JDDJS (talk) 01:56, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Leahy v Attorney-General for New South Wales


A tag has been placed on Leahy v Attorney-General for New South Wales, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JDDJS (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome - please take some time to review Wikipedia policies and guidelines
Welcome!

Hello MJClapham, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, some of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, and have to be changed. Please familiarize yourself with the guidelines shown there. All edits that don't comply with these guidelines are changed to match what our MoS recommends.

There's a great page about the Manual of Style that has tips on how to effectively write new articles. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dl2000 (talk) 03:28, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * NPOV policy

Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~joseph/WALRC/89/P89-DP.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:53, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Watford Electronic Ltd v Sanderson CFL Ltd


The article Watford Electronic Ltd v Sanderson CFL Ltd has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOT and WP:OR problems

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 18:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:cDqJebpffIIJ:www.lawofcontract.co.uk/cases/184.php+In+1960+U,+on+behalf+of+P,+approached+D,+who+were+well-known+animal+feeding+stuff+compounders,+with+a+view+to+D+compounding+for+P+a+mink+food,+to+be+called+%E2%80%98King+Size%E2%80%99,+in+accordance+with+a+formula+prepared+by+U+who+was+a+leading+mink+farmer+and+an+expert+in+mink+nutrition.+One+of+the+ingredients+included+in+the+formula+was+herring+meal.+It+was+expressly+made+known+to+D+that+the+food+was+required+for+mink.+At+this+time+D+were+compounding+167+varieties+of+feeding+stuffs&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a&source=www.google.co.uk, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Christopher Hill Ltd v Ashington Piggeries Ltd saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Acather96 (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Devolution (biology), you may be blocked from editing. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:23, 31 March 2018 (UTC)