User talk:MJJJFFF

June 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Angus Taylor (politician) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Angus Taylor (politician) was changed by MJJJFFF (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.89036 on 2014-06-16T23:08:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:08, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Angus Taylor (politician) with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:10, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Angus Taylor (politician), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. dsprc  [ talk ]  23:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Angus Taylor (politician) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. dsprc  [ talk ]  23:43, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Angus Taylor (politician). dsprc  [ talk ]  23:50, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24hr for edit warring, as you did at Angus Taylor (politician). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bilby (talk) 00:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)