User talk:MJThomas23707

Welcome!
Hello, MJThomas23707, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as FileOne, Inc, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AllyD (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of FileOne, Inc


A tag has been placed on FileOne, Inc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AllyD (talk) 19:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

In response to your message on Talk:FileOne, Inc, no - the article does not provide "important information to the public." We're supposed to be writing encyclopedia articles here, not advertisements. Please see Your First Article.  Protoss  Pylon  19:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to FileOne, Inc. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 19:32, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at FileOne, Inc. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ben Ben (talk) 19:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * These are perfectly cited issues. Block me, you'd be surprised how easily I can work around it ;)
 * Seems you are experienced with blocks.--Ben Ben (talk) 19:43, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at FileOne, Inc, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SamX‧☎‧✎ 19:45, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  Eye snore  Summer! (PC) 19:46, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Do it and I assure you this will be logged in the pending matter, and when all the information regarding the incident is making public, national news, I will see to it that wikipedia, tried to stifle public information, regarding a PUBLIC RECORD that could prove pertinent to public trust from being displayed. This will do wonders in showing the integrity of Wikipedia and their editors. Should you wish to be counted among the MANY government entities, and contractors that are going to be shamed when the details of this is made public after their prosecutions then by all means do whatever you want to do. However, if you wish to uphold the integrity of the objectivity of this site it would be wise that you regard the phone numbers to the government agencies, the names of the government agents involved, and the warrant number as sufficient citation concerning the matter involved. Unless any of you have done your due diligence as an editor to confirm or refute the allegations through the referenced parties then you are stifling the 4th amendment right to freedom of speech and are guilty of trying to oppress the truth from being made manifest for the public in regards to entities that require public trust and have a severe amount of control over the opinions of constitutents heard by our government concerning electoral matters. I will be saving all of this and if I find one of you are affiliated with the company in question I will see to it that you too, are completely discredited and your integrity and diligence is shown deficient in any future endeavors you undergo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MJThomas23707 (talk • contribs)
 * We're not oppressing any truth here. The problem is that you are trying to write an advertisement, and add contact details to it which are not supposed to be publicly listed. This is an encyclopedia, not a place for classified ads. If you would like to rewrite the article in an encyclopedic fashion, go ahead, but legal threats and ignoring what we're saying won't get you anywhere.  Protoss  Pylon  19:55, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the Arbitration Committee at . Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:58, 21 June 2013 (UTC)