User talk:MKC65

Welcome to Wikipedia.

You recently made a large amount of editting to Walt Disney Creative Entertainment. I admit the new separation of entertainment into resorts does look better, but I would like to clear some things up with you.

The system that is unofficially recognised by most editors of Disney-related pages in Wikipedia is that whenever the resorts are listed, they are in the order that they came into being. For future reference, if you are ever unsure, the order is; And like in the WDCE page, if you ever go into sub-categories in the resorts such as the parks, the things you are listing go in order of the opening years of the parks. For example, in a list of popular rides at Walt Disney World, Test Track at Epcot would go before the Indiana Jones Stunt Show at Disney-MGM Studios, for obvious reasons.
 * Disneyland Resort - 1955
 * Walt Disney World Resort - 1971
 * Tokyo Disney Resort - 1983
 * Disneyland Resort Paris - 1993
 * Disney Cruise Line - 1995
 * Hong Kong Disneyland Resort - 2005

I also made the font sizes used for the list titles on the page smaller, as some sizes can be too large and brash. Other than that, welcome to Wikipedia, have a good time, and if you ever need any help or guidance, type your message on my user talk page :).--Speedway 18:51, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't understand fully. Do you mean that IllumiNations was produced by the in-house team at Walt Disney World Resort itself, and not by Walt Disney Creative Entertainment which is part of WDI? Same for Fantasmic? By the way, sign off your posts on talk pages by pressing the button above this text box with the image of a signature. --Speedway 15:56, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

WDCE
See, I have no objection to you changing it to "in conjunction". I object to you referring to Walt Disney Feature Animation as WD Feature Animation. This is an encyclopedia. And especially you, who claims to have inside knowledge of the Disney company and/or WDCE, I would expect to respect that? --Speedway 20:28, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure, I completely understand. :) --Speedway 20:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Camp Sankaty Head


A tag has been placed on Camp Sankaty Head requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Abductive (reasoning) 09:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)