User talk:MKGandhi55

Dronamraju Krishna Rao
Please stop. First of all, if Rao was a nominee, he wouldn't know if. By Nobel rules, nominees are not notified until fifty years after the nomination. Now, sometimes, uninvited people write in their own nominations, but these are not official nominations, and cannot be considered to have merit. Second, Wikipedia is not this person's CV. As such, we don't provide numbered lists of the person's research interests or even of their published papers. Please stick to including only what has been discussed about Rao by independent reliable sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:39, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to J. B. S. Haldane because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Pr at yya  (Hello!) 04:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Unsourced assertions at Dronamraju Krishna Rao
MKGandhi55 - Recently, editors removed a few subjective or unsourced assertions from the article on Dronamraju Krishna Rao. They tagged other statements as "citation needed" because the statements were not supported by citations to independent, reliable sources. I notice that you reinserted one of the statements. I tagged it as "citation needed" because it is not supported by a citation to a reliable source. Are you able to provide an independent source (one not written by you) that supports these statements? I notice that you and User:DKRAO55 have both claimed to be Dronamraju. You may want to look at WP:COISELF for a Wikipedia guideline on editing your own Wikipedia page. It may even help you with some of the concerns that you have about the accuracy of Wikipedia entries related to you. Thanks! EricEnfermero HOWDY! 07:29, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michele Wambaugh


A tag has been placed on Michele Wambaugh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. -- Finngall  talk  21:36, 30 June 2014 (UTC)