User talk:MLGRektMaster2k16

February 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Antoine Dodson has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Antoine Dodson was changed by MLGRektMaster2k16 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.974995 on 2016-02-11T01:39:03+00:00.

Speedy deletion nomination of Pyrocynical
Hello MLGRektMaster2k16,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pyrocynical for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rampage470 (talk) 01:28, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Pyrocynical has been reverted. Your edit here to Pyrocynical was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/user/pyrocynical) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pyrocynical, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 02:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of AustinFFA for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AustinFFA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AustinFFA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JDDJS (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

AustinFFA
If you feel that the article is notable, simply participate in the deletion discussion here. I do not feel that he is notable, but I do acknowledge that I might be wrong, which is why I started an AFD discussion instead of just tagging it for deletion. If enough people agree with you that he is notable, than it will not be deleted. So, make your case there, and not with me. JDDJS (talk) 21:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm The Voidwalker. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Deletion policy— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- The Voidwalker  Discuss 21:27, 22 March 2016 (UTC)