User talk:MLatt

December 2019
Hello, I'm TK421bsod. I noticed that you recently removed content from Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. TK421bsod (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Edward VIII, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Edward VIII, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 07:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Olga Constantinovna of Russia. DrKay (talk) 20:58, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at William IV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:00, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for removing content from George II of Great Britain without adequate explanation despite repeated warnings not to do so. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 07:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Jonathan Deamer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Timeline of Al-Qaeda attacks without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Jonathan Deamer (talk) 15:03, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Timeline for the day of the September 11 attacks, you will be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 12:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Edward VIII. DrKay (talk) 20:49, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Maria Bartiromo. Thank you. &#8209;&#8209; El Hef  ( Meep? ) 23:09, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 08:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 08:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)