User talk:MMMONSIEUR

September 2023
Hello, I'm FutureFlowsLoveYou. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to En passant have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. FutureFlowsLoveYou (talk) 20:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at En passant. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 20:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at En passant, you may be blocked from editing. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 20:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)


 * This time, I made a constructive paragraph about the running gag, is it acceptable in the page? MMMONSIEUR (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I do believe that edit was made in good faith, but it unfortunately wasn't supported by reliable sources. Content added to Wikipedia must be verifiable and supported by reliable sources, otherwise it will be removed. I haven't personally been able to find any such sources describing the meme (Know Your Meme doesn't count), and I doubt any such sources exist. For this reason, information about the meme unfortunately can't be added to the article at this time. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 20:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The reliable source is to go on the subreddit r/anarchychess, and view the thousands of comment threads about "Google en passant". MMMONSIEUR (talk) 20:21, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, that would be original research. In order to write about that we'd need a source describing those comment threads, not just the comment threads themselves. I know these rules probably seem arcane and bureaucratic, but they're needed to keep Wikipedia's article's verifiable and factually accurate and it's inappropriate for an online encyclopedia to include information that's not published anywhere else. I am sympathetic to your position&mdash;I've browsed that subreddit myself and I really do wish we could mention it in the article, but we unfortunately can't do so in a manner that complies with Wikipedia's policies. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 20:24, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh well MMMONSIEUR (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
 * There are plenty of other things you can do there, though. Feel free to ping me or message me on my talk page if you have any questions. — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 20:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi MMMONSIEUR! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! — SamX &#91;talk · contribs&#93; 20:19, 15 September 2023 (UTC)