User talk:MMRafez

February 2024
Hello, I'm Cahk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sydney Sweeney without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cahk (talk) 08:11, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Change the Sydney Sweeney template photo. MMRafez (talk) 19:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you don't accept mine upload another one but don't go back to the last one please. MMRafez (talk) 19:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Sydney Sweeney. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

What is wrong with the photo that's there already?
Explain why the photo I reverted back to is not needed. You have to give a reason as to why you added another photo instead of the previous one and explain why it's not necessary. Otherwise it's just going to get reverted. You don't want that, do you? NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Man, are you dense ? I have already explained. What's wrong with the photo I'm uploading? MMRafez (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What is wrong? You never gave ANY explanation as to why you removed the previous image. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 22:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 22:34, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit war notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Sydney Sweeney. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Snices (talk) 22:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

February 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 22:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)