User talk:MNWELSH

Thanks for your edit to welsh pony. It is good to have imput from someone with direct involvement with the breed.

However, that said, I edited it a bit because there was no link provided to the "WPCSA" web site, so your material cannot be verified. If you could include a link to the WPCSA web site under "references" in the article, that would be very much appreciated. (Footnotes are even better if you can figure out how to do them, if not, at least adding the reference at the end will help.) However, it appears to be correct, though loaded with what wikipedians call "peacock terms," which is unnecessarily flowery, unencyclopedic language. If the wording was a direct quote from WPCSA, it could stay if put inside quotation marks and labeled as such. In short, I want to welcome your contributions but just give you a heads up that Wikipedia is not a soapbox so we have to be careful to have what wikipedia calls Neutral point of view with our articles, even for our favorite breeds. Thanks again and good luck!