User talk:MNXANL

Welcome!
Hello, MNXANL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! K.e.coffman (talk) 05:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Page moving
Can you move Shanghai–Hangzhou Passenger Railway to Shanghai–Hangzhou High-Speed Railway please? User:Leon103102 (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 關東, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanto ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/%E9%97%9C%E6%9D%B1 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/%E9%97%9C%E6%9D%B1?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

GTFS station codes
I see you've added GTFS station codes to a few SEPTA stations. GTFS codes are generally used behind the scenes by software; they're not like IATA airport codes or Amtrak station codes where the public is using them frequently. As such, I'm not sure they're worth having in the infobox. Your thoughts? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * although not publicly used in rail operations, I do think those geocodes are worth to be kept in the infobox as SEPTA is still actively maintaining them. Somehow similar to SEPTA regional rail colors, despite having limited usage (SEPTA only uses those colors in tracking services), WP is still keeping and using those colors. MNXANL (talk) 21:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * The fact that they're not publicly used is exactly why they should not be in the infobox. Infoboxes are for the most pertinent information (see MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE) and should be kept as short as reasonably possible; trivia like non-public codes add length without adding value. The fact that SEPTA uses GTFS internally does not give the codes any external relevance. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I understood your point, but I resist that we should not remove that just because it's used internally. Airport ICAO code is not well-used outside the aviation field (compared to IATA), but is still a parameter at infobox airport. In terms of SEPTA stations, I do agree not all stations' pages need that code, that's why I only add them at some important stations. I will not add codes to other stations but I also think it doesn't hurt to keep the codes on pages. MNXANL (talk) 01:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree with . I see no need at all for internal GTFS codes to be included in an infobox.FFM784 (talk) 11:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philadelphia International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Customs and Border Protection.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)