User talk:MNdoll

May 2012
STOP! vandalizing Wikipedia. You may be tracked and blocked from editing to Wikipedia.-- Arn esh (২০১২) 04:35, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gurmeet Choudhary, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gurmeet Choudhary was changed by MNdoll (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870214 on 2012-06-25T15:54:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Drashti Dhami. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:13, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Drashti Dhami with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Adjkasi (T | C | L) 10:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Drashti Dhami, you may be blocked from editing. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Those links are called Spam and not every place she is seen should be included in encyclopedia. Now stop inserting that rubbish or be ready to be blocked from editing. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sonam Kapoor. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:40, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Drashti Dhami shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:43, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Drashti Dhami, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. ''Whilst part of your edit may have been constructive the addition of the spam links way outweighs the possible good. If you are trying to add them as references, note they are probably not reliable, have a look at Referencing for beginners. However, since it is a major edit, you should first discuss the changes on the article's talk page.'' Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked
You have been blocked from editing for 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at Drashti Dhami. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Wifione  Message 15:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)