User talk:MOISTE

February 2021
Hello, I'm Tartan357. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Cody Parkey have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. ― Tartan357  Talk 17:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello. Your recent edit to List of painters by name beginning with "F" appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 16:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ANM🐁(Talk/Contribs) 17:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Eagles247. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kyle Rudolph, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C)  22:13, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tanner Lee have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:43, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tanner Lee was changed by MOISTE (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96135 on 2021-03-26T14:43:43+00:00

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Eagles 24/7 (C)  01:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)