User talk:MONEEB-NJITWILL

RENEWABLE RESOURCES
I agree with you (Christophe Krief ) that I erased few things which had the proper resources but we can not keep any thing on the Wikipedia article because it has resources. we have to make sure that the thing is important for the article and its not irrelevant. for example if I take the example from the same article some added" In 1962, within a report to the committee on natural resources which was forwarded to the President of the United States, Paul Weiss defined Renewable Resources as: "The total range of living organisms providing man with food, fibers, drugs, etc...".[1]" the article. Although it has proper resource but do you think its really going to help the reader to understand about the Renewable Resource. The second thing which you said that I have not given the references which I think is not right because if you see under the reference section I have provided all the references for the things I have added. I also want to give the in the text citations but at this point I was having trouble with that. If you can help me with I would be very thankful to you. Please help me to improve this article rather than just reverting the changes. If you need further explanation for any thing feel free to ask me. The third thing which you said was I have changed the template of the article. I did not changed the template of the article the only thing which I did is that I have removed the two tags from the article because one tag says "It is incomplete and may require expansion or cleanup" and I have removed the things which were unnecessary and have provided the explanation of the topics which had insufficient details. The second tag says to provide more citation which I have already provided so I don't find any need to keep these tags. If you find any mistakes in the things which I have added please feel free to contact me. Please try to improve this article rather than just reverting the changes. I have also provided details on the Renewable Resource talk page. Thanks for your comments

RENEWABLE RESOURCES
Hi Moneeb-Njitwill, I have reverted your edits in the renewable resources article as you have suppressed a valuable reference and removed a template without good reason. Some of your insertion were interesting, and I think that they could fit in a new section, specially your comments about a new approach for protecting renewable resources. I hope that you will do so... --Christophe Krief (talk) 12:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)