User talk:MONGO/Archive08

Controversy vs Conspiracy Theories
Please justify your removal of my edition on the correspondent talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Normal nick (talk • contribs).
 * I did.--MONGO 04:01, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No you didn't. You commented the off-topic secction. I was talking about the "Biased and Non-Standard Section Title "Conspiracy Theories"" section, particularily speaking about the "motivations for the change". —Preceding unsigned comment added by Normal nick (talk • contribs)


 * Thank you so very much for your hard work on the American Airlines Flight 77 page. I can't tell you how much I appreciate it. I was worried I would have to constantly police the page for even the most veiled of conspiracy theory nonsense (made by people who will never admit their wording is "POV," when that is, in fact, precisely what it is), but I could never go too far, as I am not an administrator, and I can only do so much as an occasional user. I really appreciate that an administrator has the guts and the will to stand up to these guys who use insinuations and vagueness to mislead from the facts. I really, really, really appreciate it.

I wish more people would realize that just because a lot of people agree with them does not make their belief a fact. Just because their belief could be true or sounds like it could be true does not make it a fact. Just because coincidences happen does not make it a fact. If they can prove what they say, if reputable sources provide evidence to their claims, fine. Otherwise, it is merely a belief - as non-factual as creationism, Moonwalk conspiracy theories and the widespread misconception that Iraq was directly involved in 9/11 - and not a fact. And thank you so much again for providing a voice of reason and authority, and for recognizing that an encyclopedia - no matter who the contributors are, be they a group chosen by an editorial committe or the general public itself - should, at all times, be factual.

Thank you, thank you, thank you again.--JCaesar 10:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem...I have that watchlisted so any nonsense I remove...there is no end to this nonsense and it's inspiration ranges from political, to simply vandalism. In all but the rarest of examples, none of them provide any proof...only questions deliberately misleading and asking to prove things that are unprovable. I thank you for also helping to keep this nonsense minimized--MONGO 12:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Meditation
Hello. I'm here just to thank you for your politeness and neutral tone at |current dispute's moderation page. I also apologise you for having called you "assholes" in a private (At least it's the way I have taken it) conversation. It was just a coloquial manner of refearing to the oposition. No pun intended. Another thing that I feel I have to remeber you is that I never refered you directly as some sort of governamental spammer. I may have imagined it and expressed opinions that may lead to think I believe that. But it is to me a suposition, and never somekind of "belief". As I don't take you too seriously, you also shouldn't be doing it.Normal nick 13:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Just curious
Am I the one with the "knack for detail", or is that someone else? I didn't really consider myself a "contributor", although I would be honored to have been considered one. I can't find any more holes to poke in it, despite my fairly sensitive nit-detector. Good job. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 07:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Heads up
Respecting your wishes from the block log, I'm not unblocking, which the user has requested. It's all you. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - &lt;*&gt; 11:41, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

My (HereToHelp’s) RfA
Thank you for supporting my RfA. I’m proud to inform you that it passed with 75 support to 1 oppose to 2 neutral. I promise to make some great edits in the future (with edit summaries!) and use these powers to do all that I can to help. After all, that’s what I’m here for! (You didn’t think I could send a thank you note without a bad joke, could I?) --HereToHelp 12:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Thakathi
Hi again. I am the nominator, and there have been new developments regarding this page; a knowledgable editor has appeared who redirected and rewrote the article. You may wish to revisit your vote, since you seemed to look for evidence of notability and seemed to qualify your vote with hesitancy. -- Mareklug talk  07:06, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

At last
...I've created a new national parks article. It is lacking pictures but I hope to attend to that soon. Karoo National Park, I've been on wikibreak for a while, and got to work on it yesterday, although most of the article was expanded by a certain Celestianpower. Cheers  Ban  e  z  10:47, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Nah, it's your fault - if you hadn't started, I certainly wouldn't have touched it :P. --Cel es tianpower háblame 16:45, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Super...it a lot of work to get these article going, but after you do a few, they do get easier. I also comment on your talk page.--MONGO 11:01, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah many thanks, the locator dot is indeed correct by my reckoning. You're right, its good to get the momentum on these and I hope to remove all the red links from the list of national parks in south africa article. Regards  Ban  e  z  13:44, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Ok, sorry, I was too lazy to link it. :) List of national parks of South Africa. Cheers  Ban  e  z  05:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
For your kind words. I earnestly welcome any and all advice if there are ways I can or should approach these situations differently, and I am grateful for your continued good faith. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 04:51, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Heh! I've focused a lot on Roman articles, sculpture, and of course, contributing any relevant photography I might have taken as my 'passion pages' :) . -- User:RyanFreisling @ 05:17, 3 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Featured article? That's great. Congrats and thanks for your hard work! Oh, by the way - my college's select choir has our season finale on Saturday, we're singing Mozart's Requiem (a different, more recent arrangement though - with lots of fun new things to learn). Cheerful, to the last. :) -- User:RyanFreisling @ 05:27, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Too late - looks like it was promoted to featured article! It's a great article, too. It'll be of great service in helping readers to understand the historical climate changes and related issues of environmentalism. It's stunning, the simultaneous fragility and resilience of our world. Congratulations again on a fine, fine article. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 06:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Thank you for your support vote on my RFA. The final result was a successful request based on 111 support and 1 oppose. You were the only user who liked me so much that you voted for me twice. :] --CBDunkerson 17:28, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Bad Redirect
Striver made Bloger redirect to Blog. Obviously, this is spelled incorrect as it is "Blogger" not "Bloger". I don't know how to get rid of the redirect, maybe you can delete it? --Jersey Devil 20:26, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I nuked it.--MONGO 20:33, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks.--Jersey Devil 20:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Also, he made this redirect from Inforwars.com to Infowars.com. Another case of mispelling. I think it should probably be deleted to, who is going to go checking for the non-existing "inforwars.com" website? --Jersey Devil 21:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Hasta La Vista, Baby--MONGO 00:15, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

AN/I
I posted a note to AN/i here regarding. I wanted to let you know directly so you could offer the rest of the story, and so you wouldn't feel like I was going behind your back. I opted for ANI, rather than direct discussion with you, because so many admins were involved in the situation, and also because AN/I will be a good forum for gathering together a consensus on how to proceed. I hope everything else is well. Essjay Talk •  Contact 03:38, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Land use
Actually, I'm in Canada, so the laws are a bit different. I was just interested if any of the land use controversies were being discussed on Wikipedia. But yeah, you were right about what I meant.SkeenaR 03:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

I just want to leave.
Could you please get Kazafiel to stop reverting my talk page? I just want to fucking walk away from the project in peace. Thank you. Hpuppet - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 04:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * So all a guy has to do to get all the warnings from multiple editors (as well as a sockpuppet tag) removed from his page is ask someone to protect it? Sweet deal. If he just wants to leave, why does he need his talk page blanked? Is it because he said "fucking"? I can see how that would give you the impression that he's actually a quality editor at heart. Kafziel 04:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * He admitted he was a non-abusive sock of Hipocrite and then stated the account was now his username has also asked that that account be blanked and protected  as he is leaving the project. No big deal.--MONGO 04:32, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * But he wasn't non-abusive. Several editors (including myself) have spent the last few days trying to stop his disruptions. He admitted to being a sockpuppet right off the bat, but only admitted being a sockpuppet of Hipocrite today, after CheckUser requests were filed. He vandalized and ranted as Hipocrite until he couldn't risk it anymore, so he made a sockpuppet. If he doesn't move his history, and he doesn't say what his old username was, then it's a sockpuppet. His history of abuse should result in a ban, not in his various user pages being blanked and protected. Kafziel 04:43, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh stop whining. If wants to leave, please allow him to depart in peace. The socksniffers can come later if need be. Please stop sabtaging this users humble request. -ZeroTalk 04:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That's bullshit, and you know it. I've never vandalized a page in my life, and you're trying to make me look like the asshole? If he wants to leave, why doesn't he just leave? Why the blanking? Why the protection? Why ask a different admin to protect each of his different user pages? If he's really leaving, what does it matter? Doesn't it seem a little backwards to you to protect the vandal and then tell the editors who have had to deal with him that they're "whining"? Kafziel 05:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

The point is, if he is gone, then there is no need to post anything to his userpage anyway. If he was vandalizing, then be happy he has left.--MONGO 05:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Mongo, can you just fucking make them stop? [User:SirIsaacBrock] just wants to grind it in. Make it stop, please. Hpuppet - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 11:10, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * This editor is still editing under all three sockpuppet accounts and as you can see by the language used the editor is still a problem. Simply check the sockpuppet history accounts to confirm.  If you feel the editor is going to leave and not come back then simply block all of the accounts including the IPs.  Cordially SirIsaacBrock 12:35, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Prasi90
I think Prasi90 can edit his user pages without having the ip unblocked. I am reluctant to unblock someone who may cause serious trouble. I have not been following the details of his actions. Fred Bauder 14:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Hello MONGO! Sorry about the delay in getting back to you about the mentorship idea I had suggested last week, but my computer at home went tits up...kicked it's little cyber legs in the air and died. I did leave Prasi90 a note on his page to let him know where I am at concerning the offer. At the present I am restricted to WP involvement only from the computer labs here at my school, or whenever a friend might give me access to their home PC. Frustrating. This, and the finals I have coming up will curtail the time I have available for the next few weeks. The spirit is willing, but the machinery is weak. I will be trying to keep track of events as they transpire. Regards, Hamster Sandwich 16:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Prasi90 up to his old tricks again
We've all heard this one before. I going to request Raul if a protection of his talkpage should be in order. -ZeroTalk 17:45, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Nah...Fred has decided not to unblock him, leaving only his page unprotected...he's by this means allowed to edit those, but cannoy edit anywhere else.--MONGO 18:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

"National Monuments of the United States"
I noticed your completed list of NMs. Do you think it would be a good idea to merge it with U.S. National Monument? The list could use some header info, and the article has a redundant partial list. I also think that article is inappropriately named, as putting "U.S." before "national" is neither proper, nor actually common usage. Perhaps National Monuments of the United States? &mdash; Eoghanacht  talk 18:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


 * It was just a thought, and there is no hurry. Probably best to sleep on it before merging or renaming anyway. When was the Old Soldiers Home made an NM? &mdash;  Eoghanacht  talk 20:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Neo-Mitochondrial Creatures cont.
I've expanded the opening of the article somewhat to help assist the reader in the purpose of these creatures' role in the video games, and I also moved the images back to gallery format for the time-being, as I uploaded some new additions and it was interrupting the formatting. I'd like your humble opinion on the article, if possible. -ZeroTalk 15:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

New! Improved! Lemon scented!
Dear MONGO; please take a moment or two to read this post and the related discussion. I will be asking at WP:AN for the block to be lifted and the tags removed from Prasi90's page. Wish us both a little luck, would you old boy? Best regards, Hamster Sandwich 17:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)


 * MONGO, I sincerly hope that nothing that I have done concerning my offer to help mentor Prasi90 has been mis-construed by you to have in any way been meant to be disrespectful towards you, or any other editor. I was drawn into the fray, so to speak through a perusal of the RfC page, something I look at regularly. I thought, "Well heres a situation where I might be able to help..." Thats the long and short of it. I ask only that you take a step back, be less a bit less intractible and give me a bit of room to help change the direction that Prasi90 took in his Wiki infancy. It could be a matter of giving him enough rope to hang himself, or it could be where he "gets it", and becomes a good solid editor. Stranger things have happened! Hamster Sandwich 18:20, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I hope that Prasi90 dosn't confuse kindness with weakness. I am willing to extend my good faith towards him, but if it is ever thrown back into my face... I have already informed him I will not suffer any foolishness. Thanks for understanding where I am coming from with this effort MONGO, I'm taking some baby steps here myself. Peace! Hamster Sandwich 18:52, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Accusations
What are you talking about Mongo? I wasn't accusing you of anything. And what kind of defense do you mean? No legal threats remember? If you want an honest answer from me, no, I wasn't accusing you of anything, but a lot of people will probably see your recent archives as a form of censorship, whether anyone paid you or not. I bet they will. Still, sorry about the misunderstanding. And please ask me about stuff before you go and get so pissed off. SkeenaR 03:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Mongo, in all honesty, when state that you work for USDHS and then immediately archive the ensuing discussion that lasted for about 3 days, I'm sure a lot of people are going to assume it's because you don't want people to see it. SkeenaR 03:31, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Now what are you on about? I already apologized for your misinterpretation and my possible ambiguity once above and once here. Twice ought to be sufficient even for you. SkeenaR 03:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

NWR Reply
Thanks for your message. I've replied on my talk page. ClarkBHM 15:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Censorship policy
I saw you voted in the earlier poll. Have you seen: Wikipedia talk:Censorship? Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 21:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The CIA and September 11 (book)
I hate pestering people's talk pages about AFD votes (or votes at all... it's very bad form really) but I've just done a huge amount of work on this article, and it is probably 80% different from when you voted. I have found a large number of English language references, and I have used so any reader or editor can identify where each individual statement in the article came from. That ought to deal with WP:V and WP:RS. As for notability, you can make your own decision: the relevant guideline says "Usually, books with an ISBN-number and/or availability in a couple dozen of libraries and/or a Project Gutenberg type website, and with a notability above that of an average cookbook or programmers manual would qualify". Which doesn't help really, since it's entirely subjective how you are going to compare notability of a best-selling paranoid gutter-press fantasy to a cookbook! If you rank this as below an average cookbook, I'm not going to argue with you :) TheGrappler 04:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Not interested in arguing. But there appears to be no concensus to delete anyway.--MONGO 05:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Merecat
Hi MONGO. In case you didn't see this - another of Merecat's recent edits was the renaming and redirection of the Plame Affair page to a new title, Wilson-Plame Scandal. Merecat has not provided any rationale for the move, and there is a [substantial opposition] to the move and unilateral renaming among the page's prior editors. In addition, csloat has put a request on 'requested moves' to restore the page to the consensus title.

So far, Merecat has not responded to messages on his talk page, nor on the article's page, and the article remains in it's current, non-consensus state. Would you mind taking a look? -- User:RyanFreisling @ 20:15, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Mount Rushmore on WP:FAC
Hello, thanks for voting on the FAC for Mount Rushmore. I have addressed the several issues that you brought up in your comment, and for the remaining issue about the disambiguation link on the top of the article, I'm not too sure if notability plays into whether or not it should be there (see WP:D). Thanks, AndyZ t 23:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Kusma's RfA
Hello, MONGO! Thank you for your support in my recent successful request for adminship. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:41, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Just shut up Amorrow
MONGO, I guess you're not in. I've removed three trolling IP posts which look to be from the same user who's trolling ANI about User:Gator1, and I've sprotected this page and (just a thought) your userpage also. I hope that's all right, sorry for the interferingness. Please look in the History to read the posts if you want, it's a real treat. Shut up Amorrow. (Edit conflict, so I'm not sure if I removed them or somebody else.) Bishonen | talk 01:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC).

OK, it turns out NSLE has blocked the range, so I've unprotected your pages again. Sorry about that. :-) Bishonen | talk 01:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC).
 * Oh, no problem, as your judgement is always respected by me.--MONGO 07:15, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

mess
no, i hadn't heard of it. very unfortunate. it's sad that you have to conceal your true identity, or risk harassment in real life. i actually changed my user name about a year ago because i revealed too much. trolls and vandals are par for the course, but when you go after someone's livelihood ... well, you ought to get sent hunting with cheney. honestly, who could possibly care enough to do that level of stalking? it makes it all the more disturbing, because the person probably really is psycho. very sorry to hear it. he had really turned out to be a good guy. Derex 07:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * MONGO, I've responded to you about the mess privately, and we can continue by email from now on. JamesMLane t c 08:47, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks!--MONGO 08:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

re:Gator1 and invasion of privacy
I know who sent the correspondance to Gators place of work. This vandal leaves a trail behind him just like a snail...criminals usually think they are smart, but they always leave clues and in this case, the clues were easy to track.--MONGO 18:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)


 * How is Gator1? I hope everything has worked out but I'm disappointed to have not seen some decisive stance taken by the wikipedia chief. I hope things have been done behind the scenes and that Gator1 has had any help he needs. Please pass on my best wishes to him as I don't have his e-mail address. Gilraen of Dorthonion AKA SophiaTalk TCF 14:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Glacier National Park (US)
I noticed on your user page that you wanted to make some improvements to the Glacier National Park (US) article. I went on a hiking trip there last summer, and while that doesn't make me an expert by any means, I can see about helping out. In particular, I have a number of pictures and a description of the trip at this link, so I'd be willing to contribute any of the pictures under the GFDL if they're worthwhile. I also bought a DVD that gives more explanation of the park's features (along with a bunch of scenic photography, of course), so that might be useful for research. If you have general ideas about what to do to improve the article, or stuff that's lacking, let me know and I can help out. -- E lkman - (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Humala Page Again
The vandals have returned for the Ollanta Humala page. The increased activity is due to the fact that the election occured yesterday and the results are coming in today. I'm pretty tired of having to deal with these guys. --Jersey Devil 20:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Shotokan Dispute end of Feb thru beginning of Apr 2006
(Original Message:) Howdy. I have been asked to look at some issues regarding edits as related to a content dispute with User:Southwick in the Shotokan article. I noticed you posted here regarding an email you claimed to have recieved from Southwick. In your note to User:Wsiegmund you didn't include the email addresses, claiming they were snipped, I suppose to protect others from having their privacy invaded. Is the wording as you posted exactly as it was recieved by you in email? I would need some kind of proof that this is the case. I will be on and off line for the next couple of days, but often enough I can check back here or on my talk page if you prefer.--MONGO 01:49, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * (Reply:) In addition to snipping the email addresses, I also snipped my name without mentioning it; otherwise the wording I posted is exact. I could forward you the email message with complete header. Could you give me some email address of yours to use? ...or please specify a method of proof that I could supply. Regards, Cap j 17:05, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * (Further reply:) I forwarded Ron's email to User:Wsiegmund's email address with request that he forward it on to you. I noticed that I had also snipped Ron's contact information from his email that I had posted on Walter's talk page. Regards, Cap j 17:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, the reason I am asking is because I responded to this complaint on the Personal attack intervention noticeboard, in which Southwick complained that you contacted his place of employment in regards to a content dispute in the aforementioned article. I then saw that an editing associate of mine (User:Wsiegmund) had gotten a snipped email that you claim came from Southwick. Southwick responded to my the email I sent to him after I responded to the Personal attack invervention messageboard and told me that you had indeed contacted his place of employment, so I know Southwicks email address already, unless he used a different one to email you. You can email me by going to my userpage and clicking the e-mail this user link on the left of the screen...I think you need an email as well to do this, so you may have to set one up...a temporary one will do. As the respondant to Southwick's complint, I keep all emails and personal information confidential. As I said, I need proof that Southwick sent you the email you claim he sent. Thanks for your time.--MONGO 03:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Bush Crimes Commission
You are invited to vote in Articles for deletion/Bush Crimes Commission (2nd nomination) Morton devonshire 20:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * MONGO, I debated posting on your talk page but decided against it, and now I wish I had. I still feel it was inappropriate for you to respond to Morton devonshire's POV pushing campaign, or at least to fail to note that he had messaged you.  Additionally, since it is a politically volatile subject, it would have helped if you had clearly posted a valid reason for deletion rather than requiring the reader to infer the possible valid reason and not one that was quite so, I don't know, opinionated...?  Even at times where I've agreed with you, you've struck me as unnecessarily confrontational.  Maybe that's why Striver thought you were threatening him, although from what I could see I didn't see a threat or anything resembling one.
 * Certainly, I do believe Bush should be impeached; there's a difference (I think) between an expression of POV on a user page and in an article or AFD. Additionally, I had initially recommended merge on this article (which I had never visited before, that I recall), and as I noted on Morton's talk page, I feel the group/event is impotent and kind of sad, but nonetheless notable.  Notability of groups and events seems like a judgment call, since policy or guidelines do not have much to say on that point that I'm aware of.  To the extent that the article suffers from POV pushing, I believe that can be addressed through cooperation.  Morton's behavior trying to delete the article makes me uncomfortable, just like Striver's efforts to keep similar articles does too. Шизомби 20:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * They would only be notable if they had the power to legislate an article of Impeachment. They don't...and they are a sad bunch. My vote was right on, and your comments that I was involved in some POV push or that my vote doesn't following guidelines is borderline personal attack...let's not do that again. I don't have to give any reason for my vote.--MONGO 01:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I regret not having made a comment on your talk page before deciding to post on the administrator's noticeboard. However, it is quite clear that Morton is doing a POV push to delete to the article, and I think as an administrator you should have distanced yourself from that by noting he had contacted you, like Jersey Devil did in the AFD.  Otherwise, it seems like tacit approval.  I agree you're under no obligation to articulate a reason in an AFD if you don't want to, though obviously if you want your opinion to be considered, you would.  I did not single out your comment because I thought it was the most objectionable of the comments in the AFD; I don't.  I felt it was problematic because you're an administrator and I would prefer to see administrators conduct themselves in an exemplary way; perhaps I'm wrong to think so.  I did not suggest any action against you in my comment on the noticeboard, I merely posted it to let administrators decide if your conduct was objectionable in the way that I thought that it was, and if anything should be done or not.  It seems they don't; so be it.  I made the post in good faith, and don't harbor the deep-seated objections against you that, e.g. Striver does.  Clearly the articles you've created are better than anything I've done yet.  However, I don't see what I did as a personal attack and that accusation and the comment "Let's not see you do this kind of thing again" are instances of the sort of confrontational tendency I've seen that I mentioned above.  I politely remind you: "not to make abusive remarks, keeping wikiquette and civility in mind at all times." Шизомби 02:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Let me add though, I don't intend to do it again. Шизомби 02:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * As you said, I am an Administrator and I know when I see a personal attack...ranging from the original title of the subheading: "MONGO behavior unbecoming an admin" and further comments such as "perhaps that sort of behavior ", "derogatory POV way", and "("administrators are just regular editors with a few extra buttons") and they can behave just as badly as a regular editor"...are indications to me that you are labeling my actions as bad behavior, when there wasn't any, and is therefore a personal attack. You must not do many votes for deletions for I have seen admins and others simply unload. I expect an apology....and next time, if you have a problem...just ask...don't go around someone and try to make them look bad on a noticeboard just because they are honest and straight up with a comment they make on an Afd or elsewhere. I can see no reason that my vote was left open to interpretation...I voted "delete"...was anything else I said in the comments a twist on words to the vote...hardly. I think you need to think this over carefully, and don't tell me I am being confrontational...I am suppose to confront someone when they are violating policy.--MONGO 02:38, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I noted above "I debated posting on your talk page but decided against it, and now I wish I had" and "I regret not having made a comment on your talk page before deciding to post on the administrator's noticeboard." The wording of my comments on the noticeboard I see now was unfortunate, although I feel what I've posted above here is quite reasonable.  I've identified very specifically what I thought was objectionable and why.  kingboyk and JDoorjam both stated that a closing admin could ignore your recommendation in the AFD, though they noted that they felt it was unlikely that that would happen.  It was Syrthis that I was quoting who wrote "administrators are just regular editors with a few extra buttons" and he also noted that your comment was "snarky" though far less so that the other comments.  Perhaps other admins do unload in AFDs as you say; this was the first time I'd noticed it.  I apologize for posting on the noticeboard without contacting you first.  I apologize for having posted to the noticeboard about you and for the way I worded things on that board.  I still have the objections I made above, but I understand they are not ones that are important to WP now.  I've said I won't do it again, and I certainly would raise a concern on a talk page first in any other matter where I would consider posting on the noticeboard. Шизомби 03:02, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks...just remember...I have been around a while and I will also heed your comment that I need to be precise in my votes for deletion. I will attempt to be less harsh, shall we say...happy editing.--MONGO 03:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Post from banned user removed
Post from banned user removed, per Jimbo's instructions. Still in the history, if you want to read it. Cheers. AnnH ♫ 13:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I saw that and understand. It's interesting to me that Andrew W Morrow claims someone in Europe "found out" who Gator was, but all the inquiries into Gator's license to practice law, as recorded in his talk pages by IP, originate from San Francisco, not Europe.--MONGO 15:45, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

RFC regarding editing dispute at Rationales to impeach George W. Bush
Your comments are invited at Requests for comment/Merecat.

Merecat 20:01, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Base Object Model
Oops, did I do something wrong with that article? —Veyklevar 07:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, I see now. No problem. —Veyklevar 07:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again, Mark83 08:59, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

hail to the chief
For the record, Bush has about as much chance of being impeached as I do of becoming the President.--MONGO 07:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I'd vote for both, Mongo :) Derex 01:20, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ha! I figured as much for Bush's impeachment, but no, me as President...no bad idea...very bad.:-(--MONGO 01:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, you couldn't be worse anyway. But you're right about impeachment, because everyone knows Darth Cheney would be. Derex 05:23, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Bonaparte
Yes, would you please be able to semi-protect Transnistria? He just reverted again, thank you. --Khoikhoi 06:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

afd
Hey, MONGO, why dont you put a procedural delete on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/9-11: The Road to Tyranny (2nd nomination)? I mean, i created it, and its about 9/11, how could you possibly resist voting "delete"? Chears! --Striver 11:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, Striver, put me on your do not call list! Stop forking all these articles when there is plenty of room in the main articles for their incorporation.--MONGO 15:58, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Request
Hi MONGO, can you please help me out with the situation at the Armenian Genocide page? Some user is inserting obvious POV and isn't really discussing things that much. Thanks. &mdash;Khoikhoi 05:29, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll look over the edit history...sounds like a subject though I know little about so as far as content, all I can ask for is for it to be well referenced.--MONGO 05:31, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Speedy delete images ?
Hi MONGO. Is it possible you could speedy delete an image? See Image:Hiv2.JPG, Images and media for deletion/2006 April 16. Hiv2.JPG is a copy of confidential information. Thank you. --ElectricEye 08:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Zapped...I'll watch the uploader as he/she seems to be a new editor.--MONGO 08:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks!! I am a member of the Welcoming Committee and welcome all newly registered users regardless of their edits.(WP:ASG) I keep an eye on many of them to see if they need help. I also keep an eye for new users who are causing trouble. Waikiki!!! ^_^ --ElectricEye 08:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, and good to see those that welcome newbies.--MONGO 09:01, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Admin services needed
Sorry to bother you, but I have a short list of things on my to do list that require an admin. Would you mind? —Doug Bell talk•contrib 08:52, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The User:Doug Bell/Golf-course18-head is a redirect since I moved the page to template space. Just the redirect needs to be deleted (thanks for checking before deleting the template page, as yes, there was a bit of work involved in it.) —Doug Bell talk•contrib 09:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem...wanna be an admin?--MONGO 09:42, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Chief Mountain
Nice work on the article, Chief Mountain. What a remarkable sight! It is a pity the rock isn't more sound. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah...I have a few images...but as usual, they are lousy. Haven't been there since 1996...it really is time to return. I'm working on some of the stubs that will be needed when Glacier National Park (US) gets expanded. Just did Rocky Mountain Front..and still need a number of other related stubs such as Lewis Overthrust or Lewis Overthrust fault and Lewis Range...Many Glacier, Swiftcurrent Lake and some on the more important glaciers there such as Jackson Glacier.--MONGO 09:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I tried to adjust the color balance a bit on Image:Chief Mountain.jpg. I'm not sure it's better, so revert if you prefer the original. DB update seems slow. It may be a bit before you can see the new version. I went through Glacier NP with my family as a child and haven't been back. Your articles are encouraging me to return. Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That looks good...it's a great image though, considering it is from a PD source. Must have been taken the last week in September.--MONGO 20:19, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm still seeing the original 176kB image, not the modified 255kB image that I attempted to load over the original, despite the edit history and the link to the 249kB file which downloads as the original 176kB. It looks like I may have to fiddle some more and maybe turn in a bug report. Thanks for the advice on visiting Glacier NP on my talk page! I probably won't make it this summer; maybe the next. Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:09, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Latest Striver block
You know, you really are supposed to let another admin do the blocking when it is you with the beef with him... Georgewilliamherbert 00:58, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Where the heck did you get that idea? What on earth do you defend him for...I simply do not understand why some folks keep defending those that continuously violate numerous policies in this forum...it is utterly baffling.--MONGO 01:02, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Administrator Code of Conduct - An admin should not block a user if they are not neutral with respect to that user, or have a conflict of interest. For instance, an admin blocking a user for an edit war involving that same admin is abusing his or her power. That said, being accused or attacked by a user does not necessarily mean a conflict of interest. When in doubt, the admin should place a notification on the admin noticeboard.
 * I agree that what he did was a personal attack, but I don't know if a neutral uninvolved admin would agree with blocking him for it. At the very least, you're muddying the waters regarding whether he's being treated fairly or not.  Georgewilliamherbert 02:19, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Then file an Rfc on the issue. I am not involved in an edit war...I was personally attacked...I don't have to tolerate being personally attacked. I have nothing further to discuss with you on this matter and I have lost any good faith when editors like yourself continue to defend the actions of those that repeatedly violate policies. As politely as I can say it, you are not welcome company here in my user talk. I am not going to explain myself any further and your admonishments are becoming trollish to say the least. It really is time you figure out who is truly contributing and who is truly disrupting and stop making yourself look foolish by defending a known disrupter. I kindly ask you to not contact me again on my user talk.--MONGO 04:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

The Daily Show conflict
Hey MONGO, I've recently gotten into a bit of a disagreement with an editor, Mark 2000, at The Daily Show. Mark wants to insert content screaming about the liberal bias of the show; I feel his comments are hardly neutral, and he refuses to cite sources. He's already violated 3RR and I've filed a complaint to that effect, but to be honest I'm more interested in getting the article in good shape. I know that you'll scoff at any accusations of being part of the left wing of Wikipedia, and I trust you to know what NPOV looks like regardless of the political stripes involved, so I was hoping you could take a look at the changes under debate. Thanks, JDoorj a m    Talk 04:00, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
I really appreciate the recognition for putting in some stubs for Utah wilderness areas. There are more on the way. Rmwarnick 16:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Hey old man. I guess we've both come a long way since the great dry drunk revert war of 2004. Many thanks for your support on my RFA. Regards, Kaisershatner 21:14, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Clyde and the refconverter fever
Unfortunately, I think that even though we've rescued the glacier retreat article, this editor is really trying hard to make trouble around the references in a general way. The sad part is I know he is 100% in earnest, just mistaken. He spent a bunch of work writing his robot, and in the process became convinced that it must be useful everywhere... to the point of completely ignoring the problems that remain with m:Cite.php. I haven't really combed his edit history, but the stuff I've seen seems to be semi-trolling to create the illusion that use of his tool is WP policy, editors and consensus on particular articles be damned.

For the most part, there's no real harm in the conversion. Most articles have references done very haphazardly anyway, and any attention winds up improving things. And in truth, I don't see a lot of case for plain ref/note templates that don't use the Harvard author name. The first occurence problems can still weigh a bit against m:Cite.php, but not so much since it winds up being numbered footnotes anyway. Nonetheless, I am almost sure this is going to wind up with conflicts, problems, and harm to articles, emerging from his overzealousness. Not sure what to do about this... I'm almost tempted to raise a user-conduct RfC, but that probably seems more accusatory than I would want to. Maybe something like the Village Pump. It is notable that this specific issue was decided in an arbitration, where an editor was chastised for pushing m:Cite.php against consensus; maybe that's a good lever. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 06:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh, dug up the Arbcom ruling: Requests_for_arbitration/Climate_change_dispute_2. I think that was it, I was browsing though way too much administravia today. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 06:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Prasi90
See here for new disscussion: -ZeroTalk 06:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Disruptive User
Please see Colonel and its History. A anonymous fellow originating from the IP proceeded to remove information from the article. He later logged in as. His rationale was a source for the opening phargraph. According to wikipedia policy, that's a good reason. Henceforth, I provided the link in references section. He proceeded to deny this rebuttal, removing said information yet again. He doesns't convey the usual traits of a vandal, so I assumed good faith and posted on the talkpage. He responded with disbelief, coming to the conclusion I was lying.

Denying this, I inquired him why, since I provided a vartiable source, and I am quite knowledgeable on the subject. He continued on. He once again made the claim I was commiting fan-fic.

At an impass, I politely inquired for concensus from other established contributors, and to my anticipation, another editor posted on the talk, verifying what I said to be true. Now, he posts continued accusations of alledged nafraious conflict and personal attacks. He perhaps means well, but his inability to comprehend established facts gives me cuase for concern. Since he has disengaged in any meaningful discussion, I came here. I'm asking if the article can be protected and a brief block issued. I'm being patient, but I don't tolerate nonsense and vandalism of articles.

As of the most present update, I've posted a warning on his talkpage. I recomend action be taken if he disregards. I don't mind being called things, but I'd like it he didn't take it out on the articles.-ZeroTalk 20:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for intervening. If there's anything else we can do settle this situation, I would appreciate any advice on your part. -ZeroTalk 07:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I just call to say ...
... that you MONGO make me smile often - you bully :D. Don't be afraid of facts. Facts are neutral, and making verifications in articles is a good thing. The label might be ugly, but it is very practical in an ongoing encyclopedic work - 'cause you can remember wich parts of an article still needs citation, while your digging them up. Happy sunday from EyesAllMine 10:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Citation
Hi, you recently participated in discussion on Referencing on Wikipedia talk:Footnotes. You commented on having a controversy about retreat of glaciers since 1850, where the article was converted to a system against consensus of the editors on that page. I have recently begun to have a similar problem on J. K. Rowling. Since the discussion that was generated on Wikipedia talk:Footnotes does not seem to have alleviated the problem, I am preparing an RfC to attempt to generate further discussion from the community. I would like to ask if you would help me by preparing a summary of the controversy surrounding the glacier article. I am making the same request to User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters. Thank you. &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 19:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Wiki-MONGO
I placed myself up for constructive critisism on WP:ER. I'd appreciate it if you could comment there. -ZeroTalk 19:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Request
Please see here for a fairly serious matter. Would love you to keep your eye on this... "you people ought to be shot'., Merecat's edit of thewolfstar —Preceding unsigned comment added by RyanFreisling (talk • contribs)

Hey Mongo, you probably ought to block me for a day for this personal attack. At your discretion and good judgement, obviously. I meant it, but I also expected a block since I suspect a bunch of admins are watching that page. Fair's fair, equal treatment, rule of law, & all that. I've really been quite obnoxious lately &mdash; little patience for little games. Best, Derex 18:53, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

from thewolfstar
Fascist..an interesting choice of words. Please go here and check this out. I can't say this admin is a fascist. Fascist Smascist Socialist..all the same thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Geogre I don't object to the gun. Please educate yourself and look at this article Daniel Shays as far as guns and shooting people is concerned. We have a 2nd amendment of the Constitution... Remember The one that all you liberals worked so hard at undermining since the turn of the 20th century. Check out the policies of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin. They both had a blast with unarming the populace. Get a grip. thewolfstar 19:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC) Addition: Get a sense of humor. thewolfstar 20:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Okay...I'm not a liberal, unless you are a fascist, then I am a liberal. Don't again mention that anyone "ought to be shot". Understand? Hope so.--MONGO 20:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

I'm not a liberal or a fascist no matter what you are. I thought I made it clear that I detest fascists and socialists. (Same thing). If you block me after I just pointed you to the above admin page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Geogre then it's on you and says something about you.

You said "Don't again mention that anyone "ought to be shot". Understand? Hope so.--"

What threat is this exactly? I still am pretty new on Wiki, my start date is March 22, 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewolfstar (talk • contribs)

Since you barged onto my talk page, called me a fascist, threatened me in an underhanded way and then ordered me to end the discussion. I say.

YAZZA MAZZA Whatever you say Mazza. Okay. Okay. Just don't beat me Mazza

And if you accuse me of trolling your page now, after the way you have just acted on mine. Go right ahead.

I sure won't kiss your ugly butt. I

would suggest some serious therapy, though.

Sincerely, thewolfstar 08:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Gee, that's funny because I could swear it was you who first personally attacked me by calling me a fascist. It looks as though you are disruptive doesn't it now?

What is your problem exactly? You have to be kidding right? I'd be careful how I answered this because you may make yourself look like a complete fool. thewolfstar 09:14, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Okay, Mongo. If that was an apology, then apology accepted. Somehow I get the feeling you're a nice guy now. peace Maggiethewolfstar 09:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

September 11, 2001 attacks
As far as I know Wikipedia policy is to avoid using the word "terror" there. (e.g. Article name and the rest of this article, Osama Bin Laden article and etc.), It was also discussed in talk pages. --Haham hanuka 12:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I have seen that...there is no other word that more closely descripes the actions of the hijackers. Discuss the matter in the associated talk pages.--MONGO 12:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's considered PoV, maybe we can changed to "that was widely referred as terrorist attack by..." or something like that. --Haham hanuka 12:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Again, I don't own the article, so it's best to discuss this matter with all editors involved in that article's talk page.--MONGO 13:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Please reply to questions
Hi Mongo,

When you find the time, can you reply to my questions on ? Seabhcán 14:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi I posted a link to Loose Change 911 - What really happened on 911. Why did you delete it? Can you at least watch it? Like I had the same viewpoint as everyone about 911 until I watched this well balanced film that is super popular and far better than Faranheit 911
 * It's junk science and is adolsecent nonsense. We routinelt delete this stuff all the time...thanks for calling.--MONGO 03:00, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Personal attack on WTC7
I consider this edit summary to be a personal attack. Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 20:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That's your opinion. Continued POV mongering of nonsense in which articles and discussion pages is taken over with same is trollish behavior....get it. Oh, and good luck on that block!--MONGO 01:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Trollery
Hi. Despite valid sources and almost unanimous concensus, has gone back to reverting the page in violation of discussion. He has also descended to personal attacks; see this and other stuff on the takpage. I'm requesting a block; this user is but a troll and a disruption to the well-being of this article. -ZeroTalk 13:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * This isn't proceeding. This user has done nothing but construct personal attacks on the talkpage and revert without established fact. I humbly request he be blocked. There is nothing wikipedia can gain from these antics of silliness he's bent on promoting. -ZeroTalk 10:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I thought he was blocked for 72 hours . He's at it again . Should we bring this to the noticeboard..? -ZeroTalk 18:52, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Prasi90
Would you please unprotect his talk page so he can discuss matters with potential mentors? Fred Bauder 18:38, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Soldier's Home NM
FYI, I just started President Lincoln and Soldiers' Home National Monument. Thought you might be interested. &mdash; Eoghanacht  talk 18:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, "W" just proclaimed a new one a couple months ago, African Burial Ground National Monument, and I just added it to the list. You never know when the next one will be proclaimed -- all it takes is a shovel in the right place to turn up a significant archaeological site.  As for Glacier, I will be out of the loop for a few days, maybe when I get back. &mdash;  Eoghanacht  talk 19:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

about Template:Idw-pui
Hi MONGO, I noticed that for some reason, you left some comments that seemed to be directed at a person on this template. I'm sure it was just a mistake, however I found it strange that I was trying to use this template and your comments where "automagically" appearing along with this notice. heh. Thought you should know. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 14:52, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Redirect request
Hi MONGO. I'm not sure how to do page redirections, and I'd like to create a redirection from a misspelling of my name to my actual name, in case someone misspells it or seeks to doppelganger. Would you mind creating a User:RyanFriesling page and redirecting it to my properly-spelled name, "User:RyanFreisling"? Thanks, and I hope you're enjoying a beautiful mid-Spring. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 15:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks MONGO! I'll enable my email in preferences one of these days, and I'll send you the inside skinny :). Thank you again. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 19:48, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Re the whole de-bureaucrating thing
Hi, I never came to thank you for the message you left for me a month ago when I stepped down from being a bureaucrat. Thank you for the things you said, it's good to know there are still plenty of good people about in this project. I do not see myself standing for bureaucrat again anytime soon though who knows what the future may bring! Thank you once again. -- Fr a ncs2000 10:01, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

pentagon: here we go again
I have just uploaded files 'pentagon1'-'pentagon4'. I think I have successfully found out the author of the photographs, though I don't know the licensing details. Please tell me whether any of these images are suitable for uploading on to the site. I emphasise I only want to add photographs and measurements of the crash site, therefore do not understand why this material should be labelled 'conspiracy theory'. Thank you. RichB111.

Note:
 * user

Huh?
"Yes, it's time to get community involvement...it seems whenever I apply longer blocks I spend enormous amounts of time explain myself, so take it to AN/I...I can still block him, but wating on feedback. In the meantime, I can protect the page."

You're an admin? Right... H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 19:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes...but that doesn't give me the right to apply longer blocks if the action may appear unilateral....blocks for simple vandalism, 3RR etc for short durations are no big deal...longer blocks are considered bannings and should get community feedback...--MONGO 19:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Well admins are meant to represent equality and a level of professionality since they're the face of Wikipedia. "I can still block him" doesn't seem particularly professional. I'm sorry if I'm kinda pissing you off, just keep neutral and try not to let your friendship and your blocking log get crossed. Cheers, H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 19:48, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * It has nothing to do with a level of professionality.


 * This user is but a troll; see his contributions and the post on WP:AN/I. Completely unacceptable behavior. -ZeroTalk 19:54, 29 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I can SO trump him! I came across a user who shouted at people who removed a "mdash" from an article, and shouted at them saying "add some content, jackass!". A charming fellow. H ig hway Rainbow Sneakers 20:00, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

TruthSeeker has written an article about you
Let me know if you would like to comment on it prior to its publication. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthSeeker1234 (talk • contribs)
 * No comment...you can link me to it though.--MONGO 05:27, 1 May 2006 (UTC)