User talk:MOttaCossaOb

MOttaCossaOb, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Your contributed article, Royal College Panadura'


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Royal College Panadura'. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Panadura Royal College. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Panadura Royal College – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Theroadislong (talk) 09:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Panadura Royal College has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Panadura Royal College was changed by MOttaCossaOb (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92265 on 2013-12-18T06:55:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Panadura Royal College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Materialscientist (talk) 09:11, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Royal College Panadura'
I deleted the category you created because Category:Panadura Royal College already exists and you added an apostrophe at the end. Plus, you added a redirect back to the main article, which isn't appropriate. If you need help, let me know. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Moving Panadura Royal College
Please see Talk:Panadura Royal College/Archive 1 and get consensus for such a move before doing it again. Thanks, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Please don't restore the article at Royal College Panadura. Please leave the redirect there. If you wish to discuss the name, do so at the article's talk page Talk:Panadura Royal College. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Warning
If you make any more edits regarding the name Panadura Royal College‎ without first discussing it at the appropriate talk page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:51, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Royal vs St. John's
Hello MOttaCossaOb,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Royal vs St. John's for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)