User talk:MRDETROITMETAL

Welcome!

Hello, MRDETROITMETAL, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Automotive artists, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:27, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Your contributed article, Automotive artists


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Automotive artists. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - History of the automobile. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at History of the automobile - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:27, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

 RESPONSE in Consideration of this opinion and resulting action taken : 

While I do appreciate your perspective, it dose seem that the action taken is inappropriate as the intent of these contributions was ONLY to exhibit True Verifiable Facts in an entertaining manner. Obviously as this was a "first attempt" it seems quite an over reactive action to block an IP for an honest effort, and a bit extreme in assuming the veracity of the content. In this case, it seems the real error was not so much on the contribution, but within the reaction to this. had your administrator taken the time to verify what was written, then it would have been clear that indeed this was no "PR Stunt", but rather a unique event sequence of facts that represent actual interest in a cultural shift, in the reality of Art as it is accepted by persons in the 21st Century. Had some patience, and guidance been demonstrated to assist in the compositions, this circumstance would never have occurred. Truthfully, I am not going to waste time sharing if there is no recognition that in the past your website has trusted our content as a reference on other articles, yet when you have it all handed to you, the content now seems unbelievable and is summarily deleted for an administrators lack of willingness to check the facts. Before I ever contribute again, there will need to be an invitation to do so on your website's behalf. Thank you for your attention to this note, and hopefully your administrators will check the background of the contributor before assuming the content is just another "teenage wanker", ...better yet perhaps YOU should write these contribution topics and profiles, from verified sources as a small search or a call to GM, or Daytona Speedway would provide all the proof you need to realize this was all about the facts. I admit that in my unfamiliarity with submitting content to your site, I was also unaware if the technical process required, but such an extreme action is absolutely unwarranted, assistance and guidance would have been the better choice in this matter.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:MRDETROITMETAL


A tag has been placed on User:MRDETROITMETAL, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:28, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. Peridon (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

S PA M ? is that : subjective personal assumption misinterpertaion, or seriously perfect art meessage ?
There is a old adage..."never judge a book by it's cover" as by doing so you assume you already know the content inside,..which of course you will never know that unless you open the book and read it.

HOWEVER....if you can prove by actual fact that my contributions or content are not in fact, proven by verified, existing truth and NOT just an editor administrator's personal assumptive prejudice, and allow the development of both page contributions, as I can and will provide documented evidence to justify every concept as posted. The article while dose start at the invention of the automobile, it is just a grounding for the discovery to follow. Your editor's have No Idea as to specific's of what I am contributing as they have shortchanged your audience from the opportunity to relate the topic to it's formation and independent significance.a

If you exhibit reasonable recognition of WHO you are addressing and that indeed Wikipedia has already valued the reliability of previous content article references as linked from the website, which is. as trusted as a verified source related to other article content, we can work the content to satisfy the process required.

We do not agree with your "snap judgement" to block us,...as ignorance is not an excuse.

Unblock so that you may discover the Truths which are presently contained inside the build, or remain in darkness to assume your Inability to Deliver.
 * Try discovering the Truth about how to appeal a blocking, contained in the buff-coloured box above... I am addressing whoever you are. I don't expect you to agree with me. I would be pleased if you would read WP:USERNAME, WP:SPAM, and WP:NPOV for a start. Peridon (talk) 19:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

I read this all, however your assumptions are that the names, content and article were specific to your perspective of our intent, however as there was no allowance in the time period prior to your assumptive action, where the entire factual event sequence could be unfolded to clarify that there was no deliberate effort to effect the assumed purpose your action imply, as your block delete has prevented your ability to see the "objective point of view" here. This is actually a reality beyond your expectation, and YOU are pretending that your block has the ability to conform facts to a predetermined set of standards...how long can you hold your breath ? ...or accept the truth as it happened, let us lay it out as it is and THEN we can discuss formatting to fit your presentation...but your comments to justify the blatant assumption that the article "Automobile Artists" is a duplication of the history of the automobile perfectly defines how your action is totally unfounded and arrogant in the abuse of pretending you can read the future into our words.

I do not expect you to like what is written here, but that is beside the point, you have No Right to assume that you understand any of the content posted, as you have YET to SEE anything close to a complete canvas presentation. Obviously, you guys are NOT Artists, nor do you comprehend the concept or process required,...you heard 2 seconds of a 3 minute song and pulled the plug. THX.

Work it bro, don't tell me ....Show Me your up to the Skills.

Backatcha. ???
 * I've got the skills - I'm a writer and musician (and have played live to 10,000), and I'm an admin here - have you read WP:USERNAME yet? I don't think so. Or WP:NPOV. How long can I hold my breath? Long enough. Long enough to worry people in a first aid scenario where I was playing a non-breathing body - and didn't apparently breathe for about five minutes. I didn't delete Automobile Artists. I blocked you for your username and promotional edits. I don't worry about 'like' with my editing here. I've rescued from deletion an article about a rapper, and, apart from K'naan, I don't like rap. I've deleted articles about things I did like - because they needed deleting. Now, it's over to you. This is our field, it's our ball, and our rules. Are you going to play our way, or go on trying to play cricket with an American football? Peridon (talk) 22:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

If I were you I would understand that your "game, rules and tools" came about from contributions by people with first hand skills of experience, knowledge and direct resource connections from their life and are willing to share what we accomplish, create and offer you the same opportunity in presenting our contribution as we professionally require you to exhibit, if you really want inside the "gameplay".

Your editing is a formatting of the content I deliver and I welcome your efforts to, once you allow yourself to see the entire picture and scope of the "article", format the presentation to "fit in the box" anyway you prefer for your purpose, as long as you do not alter the content from the original intent, which is to share the facts...professionally with a consistent image and design of my own creation. I am the Artist, feel free to hang whatever frame you want on the work I deliver and put it wherever you want to exhibit the final work.

The same holds true on my profile user page as you certainly would not call Andy Warhol, Andrew Worchinsky....or omit that he employed commercial techniques from his job at Hallmark to create his style of "pop art".You can't talk about Surrealist Art and forget to mention Salvador Dali was the greatest painter in the history of Art, because that is exactly what he said he was...and set about to prove that by exhibiting the evidence, which was his Artwork. His entire life was surreal, speaking four languages, one word in each in every phrase as he spoke..he certainly was not "playing by your rules" but his message was in the delivery of the media of each Artwork he presented!!!...see what I am saying here now ?

I don't play games, I CREATE Art, that results in producing movies, TV, Music, websites... I am not playing "ball" as I can't afford to do that when I am on the race track NOW at 200 mph. So, if your in my way you have 2 choices, move over and get behind to catch into the draft, or crash.

That is your choice, mine is already a commitment. This is what I do, and I work with some of the biggest companies (GM, NASCAR, Budweiser, Corina, Jet Blue, Carnival, Coca Cola...) who pay for the opportunity to exhibit what we create for them, on OUR terms. This is all verifiable fact you can find for yourself, or I can provide you the links, contacts or phone numbers to reach those that can for you. I am actually creating an Auto Company from GM product base platforms with the full understanding and cooperation of GM executives...who are interested in supporting what I created from what they produce, not telling me do this do that, rather it is "here is how we can help translate your designs into production". So when did Wikipedia get over on GM ???...I MUSTA MISSED THAT DAY !!!

I play before an audience of 55 million every day !!...continuing to produce & perform live at NASCAR races, tour to record live "albums" with top recording artists,(Rolling Stones,U2, Wille Nelson, AC/DC, Aerosmith, Commodores, James Brown...and I also kick out the licks on guitar or a synth while doing the editing or live mix...and NONE of those corporations or performers ever tell me how to do what I do...they just Pay me to Do It, so what exactly is it that you Don't need to learn that qualifies your all knowing all judgmental wisdom ?

NOW IS THAT ^ UNAMBIGUOUS PROMOTION ?...well actually, not really as it is ALL VERIFIABLE FACT So there ya go bro, get up with it. Take what I give you, make it look pretty in a box and say thank you...or don't listen to me and run the risk of being wrong.

BTW, if you like you can send me some of your music and I promise not to tell you to change it or sat that E minor should be an A sharp, I will take what you do and see if I can find the best place to exhibit your work to benefit you and your audience so that they may appreciate what your doing or have accomplished already...and get the facts.

That is what I expect YOU to do in all fairness, at least listen to the entire story or "song" before you start telling me how to do it. OK ? Below are a few reference links &...

WHEN YOU ARE READY TO WORK I WILL BE PLEASED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETE UNFOLDING STORY ON AUTOMOBILE ARTISTS...which obviously you know Nothing about, as it is NOT the history of the Automobile, it is the sequence of popular art and how the "car" has become the Art Media of the 21st century with an overview of ALL the past designers and artists who have participated in creating this form of ART EXPRESSION. Peter Archer aka MRDETROITMETAL @ stingraysstudios.com

Hey at least I know who you are now....your Alice in Chains ; "Man in the box" Standing in my...

Next. Go Create Reality

NOW