User talk:MRRaja001/Archive 2

Recent AfD nomination
It looks like you were trying to nominate an article for deletion here: Articles for deletion/M. Santhi Ramudu, but actually used the template for closing a discussion, so your intentions are unclear. What were you trying to do? Bakazaka (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Please nominate the article for deletion. My intension is to delete the article only. MRRaja001 (talk) 8:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * took care of it for you. Bakazaka (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Telugu Brahmin

 * It appears that this edit consists of an unexplained revert of what appears to be an unobjectionable edit that cites WP:ISAWORDFOR, specifically:
 * "Replace these cumbersome phrasings ("is a term for", "is a word that means", "refers to") with the more-direct "is"..."

Was your revert an accident or do you have a reason for it? — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 15:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I reverted and wrote it back because like in Maharashtra there are many brahmins in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana who migrated and settled here several centuries back and still speaking Marathi and Kannada, even Tamil Brahmins are predominantly found here. They all come under Telugu Brahmin Category, even though Telugu is not their mother tongue they still say that they are Telugu Brahmins. There are many Madhwa Brahmins too in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana who speak Kannada at their home and Telugu with outside people. So it's better if we mention Native of rather than who speaks Telugu just like in Maharashtrian Brahmin page.MRRaja001 (talk) 15:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, I understand that as a rationale for this edit that you made subsequent to your revert (and provided an edit summary for that explains the rationale). But in this edit, you restored the phrasing "term used to describe" that I had removed without explaining why you restored it. Do you have an explanation for this? Was it a mistake? — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I reverted to maintain Wiki standards since Maharashtrian Brahmin was also written in the same way and was accepted by many administrators. MRRaja001 (talk) 16:30, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I see. Editing for consistency makes sense, but in this case, it would seem that both articles have poor wording, per WP:ISAWORDFOR. I'll go ahead and remove the phrasing from both articles. — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:43, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah! Sure. MRRaja001 (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Great! I'm glad we could figure this out. :) — Æµ§œš¹  [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 16:51, 14 March 2019 (UTC)