User talk:MRRaja001/Archive 3

Regarding Arun Shridhar Vaidya page
Dear Raja, Please be careful of low quality sources - especially non maharashtrian sources that have an agenda against brahmins (such as the sikh agenda sources or muslim agenda sources). It is well known that General Vaidya is ckp. Many outsiders confused these communities (ckp and brahmin) due to similarities in education and rituals and same last names. see this source also if you understand marathi it is written by a marathi brahmin. He writes Ram Ganesh Gadkaris statue was attacked because he was mistaken to be a brahmin. https://www.loksatta.com/blogs-news/whos-ckp-community-1788003/ Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DifferentialCalculus (talk • contribs) 09:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Go-ahead you can add it to Arun Shridhar Vaidya page, keep up the good work.- MRRaja001 (talk) 09:39, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Satyanatha Tirtha review request
Hello MRRaja001, I'm looking at the article this afternoon to see if I can access the pages listed in the books, if I can, I'd be happy to help. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 11:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , You can refer to [History of Dvaita Vedanta] book for reference. type "Satyanatha Yati" or just "Satyanatha" in the search box, You'll find most of the information about him there, Thanks - MRRaja001 (talk) 11:35, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:  Anarchyte  ( talk &#8226;  work ) 12:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Your GA nomination of Satyanatha Tirtha
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Satyanatha Tirtha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello MRRaja001, I have started working on the review and will be posting comments shortly. If you would't mind working on my comments when you see them, we can work together as the review proceeds. I will cross them out as completed once they are addressed. Amitchell125 (talk) 19:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear that! - MRRaja001 (talk) 15:18, 20 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi MRRaja001, in the review, could you put your replies and comments next to mine? I've copied your replies so that when I reply to you it makes sense to me! I'm enjoying doing the review, by the way, thanks for all you've done so far. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 19:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)


 * , You're welcome and sure i'll do that. - MRRaja001 (talk) 20:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Suggestion
Hi MRRaja001, in my sandbox I have placed a suggestion for the article, where the three main works described in the 'Works' section are moved to the table in the 'List of notable works' section. As a suggestion, what do you think? Amitchell125 (talk) 20:02, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , We can do that. That's not a problem. - MRRaja001 (talk) 20:08, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I have a suggestion. Let's move the wikitable to Works sections and change the name of List of notable works to Notable works and add these three here. Because these three are his classical works. What do you say? - MRRaja001 (talk) 20:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Good idea, go ahead and see if you're happy with the result. Amitchell125 (talk) 06:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * sorry for that i did not see your sandbox link. It's looking good in that way. But please arrange Abhinava Chandrika, Abhinava Gada and Abhinava Tarka Tandava on top list in the Wikitable. - MRRaja001 (talk) 07:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I think what you have done looks better than my original suggestion, happy to keep the change you have made. Amitchell125 (talk) 08:05, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks - MRRaja001 (talk) 08:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Satyanatha Tirtha
The article Satyanatha Tirtha you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Satyanatha Tirtha for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 09:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Satyanatha Tirtha
The article Satyanatha Tirtha you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Satyanatha Tirtha for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 19:41, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Great work on the article! Prabhanjan Mutalik (talk) 09:58, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Prabhanjan Mutalik - MRRaja001 (talk) 10:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 June 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ekkirala Bharadwaja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ekkirala_Bharadwaja check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ekkirala_Bharadwaja?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Madhwas citing
What is the cite in this edit meant to support? The statement is In coastal Maharashtra and Goa there is a sect. among Daivadnya Brahmins who follow Madhvacharya's Dvaita philosophy. but according to the quote given in your edit the source just says daivadnya brahman sub-caste originally from coastal Maharashtra, Karnataka and Goa. We do not need to overcite stuff and that quote seems to be unnecessary. As an aside, neither your source nor the one that was already there actually support the statement because, at least according to the quotes, neither mention the sect! - Sitush (talk) 05:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi, Actually the first citation says that there are followers of Madhvacharya among Daivadnya Brahmins and the second citation says the place where Daivadnyas are present. Isn't this clear. I have added more quote for clearer idea. - MRRaja001 (talk) 05:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks. As I have just said on the article talk page, the entire section needs to be rewritten. I actually think the entire article needs a rewrite but I don't have the time to delve into it. There are far too many very poor Brahmin-related articles, especially bearing in mind that they're allegedly the educated people and, as with other caste groups, undoubtedly edit their own articles. - Sitush (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, you're right i agree with you. - MRRaja001 (talk) 05:41, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sapta Puri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Deshastha Brahmin
Hi, first how'z life. Coming to the point, is DRB a popular acronym for Deshastha Rigvedi Brahmins (like CKP) as you edited here. If not then we should not write it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, It's also present in many references. - MRRaja001 (talk) 08:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * OK then. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * These are some references "Man in India, Volumes 63-64 page 414", "Journal of the Indian Anthropological Society, Volumes 37-38", "Newsletter, Volume 2, Issues 7-12, Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies" - MRRaja001 (talk) 08:29, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Well thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:40, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 40
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 40, July – August 2020 
 * New partnerships
 * Al Manhal
 * Ancestry
 * RILM
 * #1Lib1Ref May 2020 report
 * AfLIA hires a Wikipedian-in-Residence

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

WP:SPI
Please see Sockpuppet investigations/MRRaja001 which concerns you. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * My apologies. I think you were in the wrong place at the wrong time. It was obvious that this Dhina person was a sockpuppet but I wrongly assumed, because of a focus on the same issue, that you were involved. It's a case of getting the right result – see Sockpuppet investigations/Ratan375/Archive – but not necessarily in the right way. Don't let this put you off editing because the important thing is that a ring of these sockpuppets has been caught. All the best and keep safe. No Great Shaker (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
 * It's Okay - MRRaja001 (talk) 07:47, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:47, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg John M Wolfson
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bduke • Nilfanion • Philosopher • Rspeer • Yunshui

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ragesoss
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg TonyBallioni

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg EdJohnston • Oshwah • Yamla
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Yunshui

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Anarchyte
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Yunshui

Guideline and policy news
 * Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.

Technical news
 * Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
 * Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
 * Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.

Arbitration
 * The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
 * The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.

Miscellaneous
 * A reminder that standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. (American Politics 2 Arbitration case).

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Sapta Puri
Hi, just a question about the Sanskrit text you added to the Sapta Puri article with this edit. I'm curious about where this is taken from (and I can't read the foreign-language source you've added). I've found a similar verse here – chapter 16, verse 114, of an abridged version of the Garuda Purana. Is this the original source? DanFromAnotherPlace (talk) 11:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes you're right. It is from Garuda Purana. -  MRRaja001 (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. I'll add that link to the article. DanFromAnotherPlace (talk) 11:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see you already edited it. Thanks. DanFromAnotherPlace (talk) 11:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. -  MRRaja001 (talk) 11:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali!

 * Thank you and wish you the same Mate! -  MRRaja001  (talk) 07:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Subh Diwali
.🪔 HappyDeepawali🪔 May this festival bring peace and blessings to you and your family •  .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 10:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you and Wish you and your family Happy Deepawali. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 10:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali 2020

 * Thank you and wish you the same -   MRRaja001  (talk) 23:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

 * Thank you and wish you also a Happy Diwali -   MRRaja001  (talk) 05:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Do not remove my comments
Hi there MRRaja001. I noticed this edit which you made on Requested moves/Technical requests. Please do not blank other editors' comments in discussions; if you disagree, add a comment of your own stating that you disagree. Thank you. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 13:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 41
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 41, September – October 2020 
 * New partnership: Taxmann
 * WikiCite
 * 1Lib1Ref 2021

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Vishnupad Mandir
I'd be interested to hear in what way you think this edit constitutes "disruptive editing". For the most part, I simply removed unnecessary piping, as well as making the article title match the first sentence, as per the MOS.

In reverting my edits, I can see you've reintroduced a number of errors, including restoring "Vishnupada Mandir" (which isn't the article name) in bold at the beginning of the article (I added the IAST, Visnupada, as an alternative form), as well as an incorrect reference to the "Brahma myth Brahmins" – a Google search for which turns up this page only.

Please explain your revert. I also think you should apologise for calling me a "disruptive" editor, which obviously isn't the case. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Basically Bhumihars are not "Brahma myth Brahmins' or not even Brahmins, they just claim that they are Brahmins. That's why i reverted your edits on that page. The origin of Brahmins ( irrespective of subdivisions among them ) is associated with Lord Brahma. So you should not add Bhumihar there without providing proper citations. If you think you're right please consider providing proper references for your claims, Thanks. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * OK. You should put that in your edit summary (instead of "Reverting back disruptive editing"), then, or only partially revert that change rather than the whole edit.
 * If these "Brahma myth Brahmins" aren't the Bhumihars, who are they? Because, as I said, if you Google "Brahma myth Brahmins", the only result is for this article, so that's clearly not correct either. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, there are multiple websites saying the Bhumihars are the traditional priests at the temple. If they're not, who are? Dāsānudāsa (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Websites cannot be accepted as citations, please provide citations from good sources such as News, Books, Journals etc. Please go through WP:CS, WP:RS and WP:V once, Thanks. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 19:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I understand the rules, thanks. I've been editing Wikipedia for over a decade. Where is your RS for whatever "Brahma myth Brahmins" are, which - as I've now pointed out twice - is a Googlewhack with precisely zero results outside this very article? If we don't know who these traditional guardians are, we should take out the sentence altogether. - Dāsānudāsa (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I didn't add that "Brahma myth Brahmins" sentence, but I changed and corrected the sentence with citation, Thanks. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 00:59, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello,
Have you added me for a discussion or nominated me for blocking / sock puppet investigation. Regards, .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 13:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No, i didn't -  MRRaja001  (talk) 13:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi! I wanted to know whether goddess Durga is considered Vishnu's sister or not? .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 02:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, Goddess Durga is considered as Sister of Lord Vishnu, but is form of Lakshmi and is a Brahmacharini (a celebate goddess). In Mahabharata Lord Krishna himself said it to Yudhishtira to pray Durga as his "Bhagini" but the Durga who Krishna is referring to is not Parvati Durga, it is Lakshmi Durga, who is form of Lakshmi. Lakshmi Durga only came as the sister of Krishna in Dwapara Yuga. She is always considered as Brahmacharini. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 08:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Should we add this in the infobox as she is considered Vishnu's sister in almost all traditions? .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 09:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Yes, you can add. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 11:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok - .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 11:25, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

I have a suggestion. Since you added consort as Shiva it's better if you can add "Shiva (Shaivism & Shaktism)" in this way. What do you say? -  MRRaja001  (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * I think that will look odd and the note is enough. .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 15:31, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Who sees the note tell me, even the Google search also won't see it. It'll be clear if we add like that. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 15:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * It will pop up on pc. On Google, it will be unaffected whether there is extra lines or not as it generally considered the links. .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 15:41, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Do simple Google search as Consort of Durga, because of this it'll show as Shiva. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * It will be unaffected, tried many articles like this. .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 15:46, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * And it is not even considering from infobox .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 15:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * But from some lines of the article .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 15:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Okay fine, Thanks -  MRRaja001  (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Welcome - .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 15:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

I think Durga being an avatar of Lakshmi in Vaishnavism is already mentioned in the lead. That's why removed additional info. .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 15:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Again you're doing the same mistake. Add back the note and leave it. -  MRRaja001 (talk) 16:51, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Pls come to my talk page .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 16:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Okay -  MRRaja001  (talk) 17:09, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the appreciation. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 14:51, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

••{{Font|color=white|bgcolor=Red|••{{font|color=white|🎄Merry Christmas🎄}}••}}••
""May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ..Merry Christmas.. and a ..Happy New Year.., whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you ..warm greetings.. for Christmas and New Year 2021." Happy editing, User:245CMR"

Merry Christmas and a Happy 2021
Dear User:MRRaja001

'''Merry Christmas to you and your family. '''

Wish you all a Happy and Healthy 2021.

Jonathansammy (talk) 16:55, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vaishno Devi Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sloka.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Purandara Dasa at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 14:25, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Rollback granted (1 month for now)
Hi MRRaja001. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AMRRaja001 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:10, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Autopatrolled granted
Hi MRRaja001, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AMRRaja001 added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! –&#8239;Joe (talk) 11:06, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations sir
Hello MRRaja001, Congratulations for your new permissions i.e. promotion as wikipedia editor. Glad to hear. Looking forward to more contributions for you. LukeEmily (talk) 11:59, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the encouragement . -  MRRaja001  (talk) 12:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2 States (upcoming film)


The article 2 States (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Project was shelved, non-notable production, per WP:NFF"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY 2008 22:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Okay, go-ahead! -  MRRaja001  (talk) 04:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted
Hi MRRaja001. Your account has been added to the " " user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember: The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:39, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging  pages for  maintenance so  that  they are aware.
 * You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
 * If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
 * Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

Hope for 2021
Thank you for improving article quality in December, and good wishes for a time of transition. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much, it means a lot to me . -
 * Have a good new year 2021! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you, wish you the same!! -  MRRaja001  (talk) 08:48, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2499 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:40, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Thank you Gerda Arendt. Being recognized feels good. You made my day . -  MRRaja001  (talk) 13:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I tried to give 2021 a good start by updating the QAI project topics. Please check and correct. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 05:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, MRRaja001. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AMRRaja001 granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! TonyBallioni (talk) 03:52, 7 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for that! -  MRRaja001  (talk) 03:55, 7 July 2021 (UTC)


 * So, MRRaja001, the first thing you do is to move Tripura Sundari without opening a requested moves discussion or otherwise finding out whether there was a consensus to move the page?, I think this privilege should be taken right away again. Skyerise (talk) 13:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * How is it in any way related to Page Mover rights. We can move pages even without page move rights. Lalita Tripura Sundari is the actual name of the goddess and present in most of the popular references, you can check them here. Just go through this search. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The fact that it was almost immediately reverted shows that it is a controversial move. So the "used in controversial ways without consensus" above would apply. Proper process would have been to open a requested move discussion, wait until it is closed, then implement the consensus. It's an old and established article, and this likely has already been discussed in the talk page archives. Did you check? Skyerise (talk) 16:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)


 * There are no controversies in that. I will fix it don't worry. I already started a discussion on the talk page. Its just a matter of day, Thank you. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's actually controversial. If you won't open a formal requested moves discussion, then I will. Skyerise (talk) 16:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding different name is controversial. Adding a full name of a deity is not controversial. But we have already discussed it on the talk page. They told the reason for maintaining the name Tripura Sundari. They said that popular authors such as S. Shankaranarayan, Kinsley, Frawley mentioned only Tripura Sundari in their books. So, we have decided to not move to the new name. The problem is solved, Thank You. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 02:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * there's nothing wrong with making a BOLD move that's reverted so long as it isn't a habit and the person thought it wouldn't be controversial. Moves are subject to WP:BRD as well. The move has been reverted, now if MRRaja001 wants to do so, they will need to start an RM. I don't see the need to remove page mover, especially as it was requested for NPP/AfC things.MRRaja001, I will say this, however, basically anything involving religion or ethnicity in India/South Asia is going to be controversial, including moves. Save yourself and everyone the user talk discussion and start an WP:RM first next time. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:25, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure! -  MRRaja001  (talk) 13:42, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

July corner
On DYK today, two songs, a morning song that a cousin gave to me, about the many meanings of rising, and the other praying for the courage to take the necessary steps. The morning song is a GA, - I should write more given my initials, but I also want to care for articles of those who recently died (now Esther Béjarano). - Thank you for improving articles in July, - I come a few days earlier than normally because the bloom is fading already ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks mate! -  MRRaja001  (talk) 03:24, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Keep up the Good work!
Great work overall. Please keep it up ! LukeEmily (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . -  MRRaja001  (talk) 11:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

December thanks
Thank you for improving article quality in December. If you like Advent music, check this out. If you like Christmas music and wishes, watch my user talk until 27 December ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:37, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, . -  MRRaja001  (talk) 06:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Lakshmi
Hello, regarding the recent edit dispute on the page, I've few points to discuss - As per article, the statement is - " Whenever Vishnu descended on the earth as an avatar, Lakshmi accompanied him as consort, for example as Sita and Radha or Rukmini as consorts of Vishnu's avatars Rama and Krishna respectively." There are three important information in the statement - 1) Statement mentioned the prominent avatars of Lakshmi. 2) Statement mentioned the consort of Lakshmi and her avatars. 3) The chronological order in which her avatars appeared as per the timelines mentioned in various scriptures. Now, directly coming to point, Rukmini is not mentioned before Radha because of the timeline of avatars. Radha is mentioned with Krishna in Vrindavan leelas which happened way before than the Dwarka leelas where Rukmini is mentioned. Similarly like when we mention avatars of Vishnu, its Rama whose name come first than Krishna based on their timelines or the name of Parshuram comes way before than the name of Rama even though they shared the same time period for sometime. Now, the second point regarding the consort of Krishna - I think it was once discussed on the Krishna's page also where u deleted name of Radha from consort list in Infobox. But, never mind, there are multiple research papers and books which mentioned Radha as Krishna's consort for which please check wikipedia of Radha where almost all sources are arranged and organised properly. Regarding the married consort theory, first the disputed statement do not specifically talk about the married consort. So, considering it for writing the sequence of avatars is not a good idea. Statement simply stated "consort" to present the neutral point of view. Because, in many section Radha is worshiped as lover consort while in many others she is worshiped as wife of Krishna including Swaminarayan and Radha-vallabh section. Just to avoid this POV conflict and maintain neutral POV, word "consort" is used. I hope somewhat I am able to clarify the reason behind my edit on the disputed statement. Still, in case of any further discussion required, feel free to ping me. Thanks.Kridha (talk) 05:11, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * First of all, Sita is avatar of Sri form of Lakshmi and Rukmini is also avatar of Sri form of Lakshmi. This is mentioned in all scriptures including Lakshmi Tantra. Since, after Sita, Rukmini is the form of Sri i mentioned it continuously. I didn't remove Radha. I don't know what problem you have with this. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 05:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * But Radha is also the form of Sri Lakshmi. Multiple scriptures including - Bhramvaivarta Purana, Garga Samhita, Gopal tapani upanishad, Narad Purana, Padma Purana, Narad panchratra etc mentioned her as avatar of Sri Lakshmi. She is as equal and as significant as Sita or Rukmini. Then what's the reason behind skipping her name between Sita and Rukmini. Her timeline lies just in middle of these two avatars. I just wanted to know your reason behind change of sequence? Kridha (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * See I don't have any problem with Radharani. But it is known fact that Krishna married Rukmini and Rukmini is the primary concert among all his wives. Anyways I don't have any problem. Thanks for the discussion. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 05:48, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Rukmini is the primary queen consort of Krishna in Dwarka. No doubt about it. My objection was never about that. Confusion arises when we talk about the consorts of Krishna in general or avatars of Lakshmi because different scriptures present different informations. Combining all the informations to give a holistic and neutral POV is a challenge in itself. Anyway, thanks for understanding. It was nice having discussion with you. Kridha (talk) 06:06, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
 * All consorts are not Lakshmi incarnations. Only Rukmini and Satyabhama are incarnations of Sri and Bhu forms of Lakshmi and the remaining all are apsaras and have small amsha of Lakshmi devi. This is the reason why only Rukhmini and Satyabhama are worshipped along with Krishna throughout South India, Maharashtra and Gujarat. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 06:30, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * What you stated can be categorized as a regional POV. In South, it might be Rukmini Devi who is worshiped as the avatar of Shri Lakshmi but in North and East, it's Devi Radha who is worshiped as Shri Lakshmi along with Krishna. In Barsana and pushtimarg tradition Devi Radha is addressed as Shriji. Coming to Gujarat, presently the scenario is completely changed after the foundation of Swaminarayan Sampradaya and Pushtimarg. Pushtimarg focuses mainly on Vrindavan leelas. In Pushtimarg temple, it's Devi Radha and Yamuna Devi who are mainly worshiped as the main goddesses with Krishna. They preach about Yamuna Devi as she is the guru of that tradition and worship Radha and Krishna in form of Swamini ji (Shriji) and Thakur ji(Shrinath ji) as the eternal divine pair. Even in Dwarkadhish temple in Gujarat, there is a separate alter of Radha Krishna just in front of central alter of Dwarkadhish. The idol of Devi Radha is also present with the idols of goddess Jambavati, Satyabhama, Kalindi in the seperate consort room of the temple. Rukmini devi's idol is not present anywhere inside the main Dwarkadhish temple. Her temple is situated two kms away from Dwarkadhish temple because of the curse legend. Apart from Pushtimarg, it's Swaminarayan section who is practically everywhere in the Gujarat. They are the dominating Vaishnava tradition in the entire Gujarat and they preach and worship Krishna with Radha as Radha Krishna Dev. The third Vaishnavism section emerging in Gujarat these days is Gaudiya Vaishnavism  in form of Iskcon temples. Presently, almost all major and minor cities of Gujarat is having Iskcon temple. Being from this state, I have presented the exact scenario of Vaishnavism in Gujarat. You can cross verify from wherever u  wish to. Rest in North India and Eastern India including Rajasthan, UP, MP, Delhi, Haryana, West Bengal and Manipur, it's Radha who is worshiped with Krishna as his consort. So see there is a crystal clear contrast on the question of Krishna's consorts and Lakshmi's avatar. People in different regions have different ideas and conception regarding the avatars of Lakshmi and  consorts of Krishna. That's why we try that whenever we present information on Wikipedia it should be holistic, not selective. Thanks. - Kridha (talk) 06:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Out of many Vaishnava traditions active in North, East and West (Gujarat), I included name of only these traditions because according to my understanding they are the most active, prominent, influential and have quite wide reach among common masses compared to other regional traditions active in Northen and Eastern part. They have set up hundreds of temples not only in India but also on international level and have a large community of their own. Many important and ancient temples in Gujarat, North and Eastern India are administered by them. So their ideologies, worshipping practices have wide reach which shape the present scenario of Vaishnavism in Northen, Eastern parts and Gujarat. Kridha (talk) 06:49, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * See I didn't deny anything or I haven't even removed anything. This much explanation is not required. -  MRRaja001  (talk) 07:22, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, . -  MRRaja001  (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC)archi